An officer sought permission to shoot the Uvalde gunman before he entered school but didn’t hear back in time, report says

Those were among a series of missed opportunities, mistakes and “key issues” which, if handled differently, could have helped avert the tragedy, according to the first part of a report by the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training (ALERRT) Center, an active shooter and attack response training provider at Texas State University.

The assessment, released Wednesday, was created using school video, third-party video, body cameras, radio logs, verbal testimony from officers and statements from investigators.

The report should not yet be considered a “definitive or final report as all investigatory options have not been exhausted,” it added.

Another part of the report, yet to be released, will address issues with who led the law enforcement response during the massacre; the first part noted a “lack of effective (incident) command likely impaired” law enforcement response.

Report: Once inside, officers lost momentum

The first officers who entered the building after the gunman correctly moved toward the active gunfire, the report said.

But after the gunman, who was inside the adjoining classrooms where the massacre unfolded, began firing at the room doors, the officers retreated, the report said.

“Ideally, the officers would have placed accurate return fire on the attacker when the attacker began shooting at them,” it said. To do that, the officers could have used a window that was at the center of each classroom door, according to the report.

“Maintaining position or even pushing forward to a better spot to deliver accurate return fire would have undoubtedly been dangerous, and there would have been a high probability that some of the officers would have been shot or even killed,” the assessment added. “However, the officers also would likely have been able to stop the attacker and then focus on getting immediate medical care to the wounded.”

Instead, after the officers retreated, it took more than an hour “to regain momentum” and get to the victims, the report said.

“While we do not have definitive information at this point, it is possible that some of the people who died during this event could have been saved if they had received more rapid medical care,” it added.

Having teams of officers on both sides of the school hallway was another problem, according to the assessment. If the suspect came out of the classroom, officers from both sides of the hallway would likely have begun firing, creating a “crossfire situation” in which they could have shot each other, it said.

“The teams should have quickly communicated, and officers at one end of the hallway should have backed out and redeployed to another position,” the report said.

Report highlights two doors weren’t locked

Two doors that should have been locked were also flagged by the ALERRT report: the external building door that the gunman entered the school from and the classroom door he later used.

But the teacher did not check to see if the door was locked, and so the shooter was “able to immediately access the building,” the report said.

However, even if the door had been locked, the report added, it had a steel frame with a large glass inlay — which was not ballistic glass and did not have a film — that the gunman could have shot at and then used to open the door.

Once inside, the shooter was also able to enter the adjoining classrooms, ALERRT experts noted. The lock on one of the rooms had been “reported as damaged multiple times,” according to an investigating officer cited in the assessment.

The suspect was not seen at any point engaging with a locking mechanism on the classroom’s door and “based upon this, we believe that the lock to room 111 was never engaged,” the report said.

There will also be reports from the FBI, the Texas Rangers and the District Attorney in the “coming weeks and months,” Patrick said.