Simon, J. A. & Kingston, R. E. Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 697–708 (2009).
Schuettengruber, B., Bourbon, H. M., Di Croce, L. & Cavalli, G. Genome regulation by Polycomb and Trithorax: 70 years and counting. Cell 171, 34–57 (2017).
Blackledge, N. P. & Klose, R. J. The molecular principles of gene regulation by Polycomb repressive complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 815–833 (2021).
Scheuermann, J. C. et al. Histone H2A deubiquitinase activity of the Polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB. Nature 465, 243–247 (2010).
Wang, H. et al. Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature 431, 873–878 (2004).
Campagne, A. et al. BAP1 complex promotes transcription by opposing PRC1-mediated H2A ubiquitylation. Nat. Commun. 10, 348 (2019).
Conway, E. et al. BAP1 enhances Polycomb repression by counteracting widespread H2AK119ub1 deposition and chromatin condensation. Mol. Cell 81, 3526–3541 (2021).
Fursova, N. A. et al. BAP1 constrains pervasive H2AK119ub1 to control the transcriptional potential of the genome. Genes Dev. 35, 749–770 (2021).
Bonnet, J. et al. PR-DUB preserves Polycomb repression by preventing excessive accumulation of H2Aub1, an antagonist of chromatin compaction. Genes Dev. 36, 1046–1061 (2022).
Beck, D. B. et al. Chromatin in the nuclear landscape. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 11–22 (2010).
Aloia, L., Di Stefano, B. & Di Croce, L. Polycomb complexes in stem cells and embryonic development. Development 140, 2525–2534 (2013).
Chen, Z., Djekidel, M. N. & Zhang, Y. Distinct dynamics and functions of H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 in mouse preimplantation embryos. Nat. Genet. 53, 551–563 (2021).
Parreno, V., Martinez, A. M. & Cavalli, G. Mechanisms of Polycomb group protein function in cancer. Cell Res. 32, 231–253 (2022).
Gaytán de Ayala Alonso, A. et al. A genetic screen identifies novel polycomb group genes in Drosophila. Genetics 176, 2099–2108 (2007).
Harbour, J. W. et al. Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas. Science 330, 1410–1413 (2010).
Pena-Llopis, S. et al. BAP1 loss defines a new class of renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 44, 751–579 (2012).
Dey, A. et al. Loss of the tumor suppressor BAP1 causes myeloid transformation. Science 337, 1541–1546 (2012).
Carbone, M. et al. BAP1 and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 153–159 (2013).
Katoh, M. Functional and cancer genomics of ASXL family members. Br. J. Cancer 109, 299–306 (2013).
Wang, L., Birch, N. W., Zhao, Z., Nestler, C. M. & Shilatifard, A. Epigenetic targeted therapy of stabilized BAP1 in ASXL1 gain-of-function mutated leukemia. Nat. Cancer 2, 515–526 (2021).
Abdel-Wahab, O. et al. ASXL1 mutations promote myeloid transformation through loss of PRC2-mediated gene repression. Cancer Cell 22, 180–193 (2012).
Balasubramani, A. et al. Cancer-associated ASXL1 mutations may act as gain-of-function mutations of the ASXL1–BAP1 complex. Nat. Commun. 6, 7307 (2015).
Sahtoe, D. D., van Dijk, W. J., Ekkebus, R., Ovaa, H. & Sixma, T. K. BAP1/ASXL1 recruitment and activation for H2A deubiquitination. Nat. Commun. 7, 10292 (2016).
De, I. et al. Structural basis for the activation of the deubiquitinase Calypso by the Polycomb protein ASX. Structure 27, 528–536 (2019).
Foglizzo, M. et al. A bidentate Polycomb repressive-deubiquitinase complex is required for efficient activity on nucleosomes. Nat. Commun. 9, 3932 (2018).
Sahtoe, D. D. et al. Mechanism of UCH-L5 activation and inhibition by DEUBAD domains in RPN13 and INO80G. Mol. Cell 57, 887–900 (2015).
Vander Linden, R. T. et al. Structural basis for the activation and inhibition of the UCH37 deubiquitylase. Mol. Cell 57, 901–911 (2015).
Tate, J. G. et al. COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947 (2019).
McGinty, R. K. & Tan, S. Principles of nucleosome recognition by chromatin factors and enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 71, 16–26 (2021).
Morgan, M. T. et al. Structural basis for histone H2B deubiquitination by the SAGA DUB module. Science 351, 725–728 (2016).
Wang, H. et al. Structure of the transcription coactivator SAGA. Nature 577, 717–720 (2020).
Davey, C. A., Sargent, D. F., Luger, K., Maeder, A. W. & Richmond, T. J. Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 1097–1113 (2002).
Lan, L. et al. Monoubiquitinated histone H2A destabilizes photolesion-containing nucleosomes with concomitant release of UV-damaged DNA-binding protein E3 ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 12036–12049 (2012).
Nakata, S. et al. The dynamics of histone H2A ubiquitination in HeLa cells exposed to rapamycin, ethanol, hydroxyurea, ER stress, heat shock and DNA damage. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 472, 46–52 (2016).
Zlatanova, J. & Vanholde, K. Histone H1 and transcription—still an enigma. J. Cell Sci. 103, 889–895 (1992).
Jason, L. J. M., Finn, R. M., Lindsey, G. & Ausio, J. Histone H2A ubiquitination does not preclude histone H1 binding, but it facilitates its association with the nucleosome. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 4975–4982 (2005).
Zhou, B. R. et al. Distinct structures and dynamics of chromatosomes with different human linker histone isoforms. Mol. Cell 81, 166–182 (2021).
Zhu, P. et al. A histone H2A deubiquitinase complex coordinating histone acetylation and H1 dissociation in transcriptional regulation. Mol. Cell 27, 609–621 (2007).
Lowary, P. T. & Widom, J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276, 19–42 (1998).
Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J. & Richmond, T. J. Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones. Methods Enzymol. 304, 3–19 (1999).
Fang, Q. et al. Human cytomegalovirus IE1 protein alters the higher-order chromatin structure by targeting the acidic patch of the nucleosome. eLife 5, e11911 (2016).
Dyer, P. N. et al. in Chromatin and Chromatin Remodeling Enzymes Part A (eds Allis, C.D. & Wu, C.) 23-44 (2004).
Song, F. et al. Cryo-EM study of the chromatin fiber reveals a double helix twisted by tetranucleosomal units. Science 344, 376–380 (2014).
Kastner, B. et al. GraFix: sample preparation for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. Nat. Methods 5, 53–55 (2008).
Schorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. Software tools for automated transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 471–477 (2019).
Wu, C., Huang, X., Cheng, J., Zhu, D. & Zhang, X. High-quality, high-throughput cryo-electron microscopy data collection via beam tilt and astigmatism-free beam-image shift. J. Struct. Biol. 208, 107396 (2019).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Asarnow, D., Palovcak, E. & Cheng, Y. UCSF pyem v0.5. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3576630 (2019).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
Terwilliger, T. C., Ludtke, S. J., Read, R. J., Adams, P. D. & Afonine, P. V. Improvement of cryo-EM maps by density modification. Nat. Methods 17, 923–927 (2020).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
Wang, R. Y. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. eLife 5, e17219 (2016).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
Zhang, J. et al.Highly enriched BEND3 prevents the premature activation of bivalent genes during differentiation. Science 375, 1053–1058 (2022).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
More News
A deconstruction-reconstruction strategy for pyrimidine diversification – Nature
‘Orangutan, heal thyself’: First wild animal seen using medicinal plant
UTIs make life miserable — scientists are finding new ways to tackle them