Maher, B. Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature 456, 18–21 (2008).
Manolio, T. A. et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461, 747–753 (2009).
Young, A. I. Solving the missing heritability problem. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008222 (2019).
De Coster, W., Weissensteiner, M. H. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Towards population-scale long-read sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 572–587 (2021).
Visscher, P. M. Sizing up human height variation. Nat. Genet. 40, 489–490 (2008).
Hemani, G., Knott, S. & Haley, C. An evolutionary perspective on epistasis and the missing heritability. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003295 (2013).
Brachi, B., Morris, G. P. & Borevitz, J. O. Genome-wide association studies in plants: the missing heritability is in the field. Genome Biol. 12, 232 (2011).
Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010).
Eichler, E. E. et al. Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 446–450 (2010).
Garrison, E. et al. Variation graph toolkit improves read mapping by representing genetic variation in the reference. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 875–879 (2018).
Martiniano, R., Garrison, E., Jones, E. R., Manica, A. & Durbin, R. Removing reference bias and improving indel calling in ancient DNA data analysis by mapping to a sequence variation graph. Genome Biol. 21, 250 (2020).
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284–289 (2020).
Hufford, M. B. et al. De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes. Science 373, 655–662 (2021).
The Computational Pan-Genomics Consortium. Computational pan-genomics: status, promises and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 19, 118–135 (2018).
Rakocevic, G. et al. Fast and accurate genomic analyses using genome graphs. Nat. Genet. 51, 354–362 (2019).
Chen, S. et al. Paragraph: a graph-based structural variant genotyper for short-read sequence data. Genome Biol. 20, 291 (2019).
Sirén, J. et al. Pangenomics enables genotyping of known structural variants in 5202 diverse genomes. Science 374, eabg8871 (2021).
Liu, Y. et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 182, 162–176 (2020).
Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558 (2021).
Ebert, P. et al. Haplotype-resolved diverse human genomes and integrated analysis of structural variation. Science 372, eabf7117 (2021).
Hosmani, P. S. et al. An improved de novo assembly and annotation of the tomato reference genome using single-molecule sequencing, Hi-C proximity ligation and optical maps. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/767764 (2019).
Alonge, M. et al. Major impacts of widespread structural variation on gene expression and crop improvement in tomato. Cell 182, 145–161 (2020).
Wang, X. et al. Genome of Solanum pimpinellifolium provides insights into structural variants during tomato breeding. Nat. Commun. 11, 5817 (2020).
Causse, M. et al. Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events. BMC Genom. 14, 791 (2013).
Aflitos, S. et al. Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole‐genome sequencing. Plant J. 80, 136–148 (2014).
Bolger, A. et al. The genome of the stress-tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat. Genet. 46, 1034–1038 (2014).
Lin, T. et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 46, 1220–1226 (2014).
Tieman, D. et al. A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor. Science 355, 391–394 (2017).
Gao, L. et al. The tomato pan-genome uncovers new genes and a rare allele regulating fruit flavor. Nat. Genet. 51, 1044–1051 (2019).
Poplin, R. et al. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 983–987 (2018).
Sim, S.-C. et al. Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS ONE 7, e40563 (2012).
Speed, D., Hemani, G., Johnson, M. R. & Balding, D. J. Improved heritability estimation from genome-wide SNPs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 91, 1011–1021 (2012).
Zhu, G. et al. Rewiring of the fruit metabolome in tomato breeding. Cell 172, 249–261 (2018).
Vinces, M. D., Legendre, M., Caldara, M., Hagihara, M. & Verstrepen, K. J. Unstable tandem repeats in promoters confer transcriptional evolvability. Science 324, 1213–1216 (2009).
The GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).
Hormozdiari, F. et al. Widespread allelic heterogeneity in complex traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 789–802 (2017).
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011).
Hormozdiari, F., Jung, J., Eskin, E. & Joo, J. W. J. MARS: leveraging allelic heterogeneity to increase power of association testing. Genome Biol. 22, 128 (2021).
Wang, L. & Michoel, T. Controlling false discoveries in Bayesian gene networks with lasso regression p-values. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.07011 (2017).
Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75–81 (2015).
Collins, R. L. et al. A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics. Nature 581, 444–451 (2020).
Mancuso, N. et al. Probabilistic fine-mapping of transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 51, 675–682 (2019).
Boyle, E. A., Li, Y. I. & Pritchard, J. K. An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169, 1177–1186 (2017).
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 9, 559 (2008).
Della Coletta, R., Qiu, Y., Ou, S., Hufford, M. B. & Hirsch, C. N. How the pan-genome is changing crop genomics and improvement. Genome Biol. 22, 3 (2021).
Li, N. et al. Identification of the carbohydrate and organic acid metabolism genes responsible for brix in tomato fruit by transcriptome and metabolome analysis. Front. Genet. 12, 714942 (2021).
Mahmoud, M. et al. Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it. Genome Biol. 20, 246 (2019).
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).
Nurk, S. et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res. 30, 1291–1305 (2020).
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
Awad, M. & Gan, X. GALA: gap-free chromosome-scale assembly with long reads. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.15.097428 (2020).
Alonge, M. et al. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol. 20, 224 (2019).
Holt, C. & Yandell, M. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinform. 12, 491 (2011).
Liu, P., Soukup, A. A., Bresnick, E. H., Dewey, C. N. & Keleş, S. PRAM: a novel pooling approach for discovering intergenic transcripts from large-scale RNA sequencing experiments. Genome Res. 30, 1655–1666 (2020).
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).
Niknafs, Y. S., Pandian, B., Iyer, H. K., Chinnaiyan, A. M. & Iyer, M. K. TACO produces robust multisample transcriptome assemblies from RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 14, 68–70 (2017).
Korf, I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinform. 5, 59 (2004).
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
Pham, G. M. et al. Construction of a chromosome-scale long-read reference genome assembly for potato. Gigascience 9, giaa100 (2020).
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).
Hoff, K., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. Whole-genome annotation with BRAKER. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 65–95 (2019).
Brůna, T., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark-EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa026 (2020).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).
Heller, D. & Vingron, M. SVIM: structural variant identification using mapped long reads. Bioinformatics 35, 2907–2915 (2019).
Jiang, T. et al. Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV. Genome Biol. 21, 189 (2020).
Nattestad, M. & Schatz, M. C. Assemblytics: a web analytics tool for the detection of variants from an assembly. Bioinformatics 32, 3021–3023 (2016).
Marçais, G. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005944 (2018).
Ondov, B. D. et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 17, 132 (2016).
Li, H., Feng, X. & Chu, C. The design and construction of reference pangenome graphs with minigraph. Genome Biol. 21, 265 (2020).
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016).
Stegle, O., Parts, L., Piipari, M., Winn, J. & Durbin, R. Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses. Nat. Protoc. 7, 500–507 (2012).
Speed, D., Holmes, J. & Balding, D. J. Evaluating and improving heritability models using summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 52, 458–462 (2020).
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).
Endelman, J. B. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 4, 250–255 (2011).
Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).
More News
Judge dismisses superconductivity physicist’s lawsuit against university
Future of Humanity Institute shuts: what’s next for ‘deep future’ research?
Star Formation Shut Down by Multiphase Gas Outflow in a Galaxy at a Redshift of 2.45 – Nature