Ross, M. B. et al. Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat. Catal. 2, 648–658 (2019).
Birdja, Y. Y. et al. Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat. Energy 4, 732–745 (2017).
Yang, Y. et al. Operando methods in electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 11, 1136–1178 (2021).
Mefford, J. T. et al. Correlative operando microscopy of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Nature 593, 67–73 (2021).
Vavra, J., Shen, T. H., Stoian, D., Tileli, V. & Buonsanti, R. Real-time monitoring reveals dissolution/redeposition mechanism in copper nanocatalysts during the initial stages of the CO2 reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 1347–1354 (2021).
Hahn, C. et al. Engineering Cu surfaces for the electrocatalytic conversion of CO2: controlling selectivity toward oxygenates and hydrocarbons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5918–5923 (2017).
Li, C. W., Ciston, J. & Kanan, M. W. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature 508, 504–507 (2014).
Arán-Ais, R. M., Scholten, F., Kunze, S., Rizo, R. & Roldan Cuenya, B. The role of in situ generated morphological motifs and Cu(i) species in C2+ product selectivity during CO2 pulsed electroreduction. Nat. Energy 5, 317–325 (2020).
Eilert, A. et al. Subsurface oxygen in oxide-derived copper electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide reduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 285–290 (2017).
Chang, C.-J. et al. Dynamic reoxidation/reduction-driven atomic interdiffusion for highly selective CO2 reduction toward methane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 12119–12132 (2020).
Kimura, K. W. et al. Selective electrochemical CO2 reduction during pulsed potential stems from dynamic interface. ACS Catal. 10, 8632–8639 (2020).
Li, J. et al. Copper adparticle enabled selective electrosynthesis of n-propanol. Nat. Commun. 9, 4614 (2018).
Lum, Y. & Ager, J. W. Stability of residual oxides in oxide‐derived copper catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction investigated with 18O labeling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 551–554 (2018).
Fields, M., Hong, X., Nørskov, J. K. & Chan, K. Role of subsurface oxygen on Cu surfaces for CO2 electrochemical reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 16209–16215 (2018).
Garza, A. J., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Is subsurface oxygen necessary for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 on copper? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 601–606 (2018).
Feng, X., Jiang, K., Fan, S. & Kanan, M. W. A direct grain-boundary-activity correlation for CO electroreduction on Cu nanoparticles. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 169–174 (2016).
Mariano, R. G., McKelvey, K., White, H. S. & Kanan, M. W. Selective increase in CO2 electroreduction activity at grain-boundary surface terminations. Science 358, 1187–1192 (2017).
Mariano, R. G. et al. Microstructural origin of locally enhanced CO2 electroreduction activity on gold. Nat. Mater. 20, 1000–1006 (2021).
Yang, Y. et al. Electrocatalysis in alkaline media and alkaline membrane-based energy technologies. Chem. Rev. 122, 6117–6321 (2022).
Hung, L., Tsung, C.-K., Huang, W. & Yang, P. Room-temperature formation of hollow Cu2O nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 22, 1910–1914 (2010).
Kim, D., Kley, C. S., Li, Y. & Yang, P. Copper nanoparticle ensembles for selective electroreduction of CO2 to C2–C3 products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10560–10565 (2017).
Li, Y. et al. Electrochemically scrambled nanocrystals are catalytically active for CO2-tomulticarbons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9194–9201 (2020).
Holtz, M. E. et al. Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett. 14, 1453–1459 (2014).
Yang, Y., Shao, Y.-T., Lu, X., Abruña, H. D. & Muller, D. A. Metal monolayers on command: underpotential deposition at nanocrystal surfaces: a quantitative operando electrochemical transmission electron microscopy study. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 1292–1297 (2022).
Williamson, M., Tromp, R., Vereecken, P., Hull, R. & Ross, F. Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid–liquid interface. Nat. Mater. 2, 532–536 (2003).
Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gao, J., Abruña, H. D. & Muller, D. A. In situ electron energy-loss spectroscopy in liquids. Microsc. Microanal. 19, 1027–1035 (2013).
Yang, Y., Shao, Y.-T., Lu, X., Abruña, H. D. & Muller, D. A. Elucidating cathodic corrosion mechanisms with operando electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 15698–15708 (2022).
Serra-Maia, R. et al. Nanoscale chemical and structural analysis during in situ scanning/transmission electron microscopy in liquids. ACS Nano 15, 10228–10240 (2021).
Chen, Z. et al. Electron ptychorgraphy achieves atomic-resolution limits set by lattice vibrations. Science 372, 826–831 (2021).
Tate, M. W. et al. High dynamic range pixel array detector for scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 22, 237–249 (2016).
Ophus, C. Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM): from scanning nanodiffraction to ptychography and beyond. Micro. Microanal. 25, 563–582 (2020).
Zuo, J. M. & Tao, J. in Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (eds Pennycook, S. & Nellist, P.) Ch. 9 (Springer, 2011).
Yu, S. et al. Nanoparticle assembly induced ligand interactions for enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19919–19927 (2021).
Yang, Y. et al. Operando resonant soft X-ray scattering studies of chemical environment and interparticle dynamics of Cu nanocatalysts for CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 8927–8931 (2022).
Glatzel, P. & Bergmann, U. High resolution 1s core hole X-ray spectroscopy in 3D transition metal complexes-electronic and structural information. Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 65–95 (2005).
Yang, Y. et al. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy of a synergistic Co-Mn oxide catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 1463–1466 (2019).
Reske, R., Mistry, H., Behafarid, F., Roldan Cuenya, B. & Strasser, P. Particle size effects in the catalytic electroreduction of CO2 on Cu nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6978–6986 (2018).
Zeng, R. et al. Methanol oxidation using ternary ordered intermetallic electrocatalysts: a DEMS study. ACS Catal. 10, 770–776 (2020).
Cao, L. et al. Mechanistic insights for low-overpotential electroreduction of CO2 to CO on copper nanowires. ACS Catal. 7, 8578–8587 (2017).
Jeong, H. M. et al. Atomic-scale spacing between copper facets for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903423 (2020).
Mantella, V. et al. Polymer lamellae as reaction intermediates in the formation of copper nanospheres as evidenced by in situ X-ray studies. Angew. Int. Chem. Ed. Engl. 59, 11627–11633 (2020).
Kim, D. et al. Selective CO2 electrocatalysis at the pseudocapacitive nanoparticle/ordered-ligand interlayer. Nat. Energy 5, 1032–1042 (2020).
Sebastián-Pascual, P. & Escudero-Escribano, M. Surface characterization of copper electrocatalysts by lead underpotential deposition. J. Electroanal. Chem. 896, 115446 (2021).
Förster, S., Apostol, L. & Bras, W. Scatter: software for the analysis of nano- and mesoscale small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 639–646 (2010).
More News
Judge dismisses superconductivity physicist’s lawsuit against university
Future of Humanity Institute shuts: what’s next for ‘deep future’ research?
Star Formation Shut Down by Multiphase Gas Outflow in a Galaxy at a Redshift of 2.45 – Nature