Venkitaraman, A. R. Cancer suppression by the chromosome custodians, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 343, 1470–1475 (2014).
Golmard, L. et al. Germline mutation in the RAD51B gene confers predisposition to breast cancer. BMC Cancer 13, 484 (2013).
Song, H. et al. Contribution of germline mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes to ovarian cancer in the population. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2901–2907 (2015).
Meindl, A. et al. Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat. Genet. 42, 410–414 (2010).
Pelttari, L. M. et al. RAD51C is a susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 3278–3288 (2011).
Loveday, C. et al. Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. 43, 879–882 (2011).
Prakash, R. et al. Homologous recombination-deficient mutation cluster in tumor suppressor RAD51C identified by comprehensive analysis of cancer variants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2202727119 (2022).
Park, D. J. et al. Rare mutations in XRCC2 increase the risk of breast cancer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 734–739 (2012).
Bhattacharya, D. et al. RAD51 paralogs: Expanding roles in replication stress responses and repair. Curr. Op. Pharmacol. 67, 102313 (2022).
Bonilla, B., Hengel, S. R., Grundy, M. K. & Bernstein, K. A. RAD51 gene family structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 25–46 (2020).
Park, J. Y. et al. Complementation of hypersensitivity to DNA interstrand crosslinking agents demonstrates that XRCC2 is a Fanconi anaemia gene. J. Med. Genet. 53, 672–680 (2016).
Vaz, F. et al. Mutation of the RAD51C gene in a Fanconi anemia-like disorder. Nat. Genet. 42, 406–409 (2010).
Shamseldin, H. E., Elfaki, M. & Alkuraya, F. S. Exome sequencing reveals a novel Fanconi group defined by XRCC2 mutation. J. Med. Genet. 49, 184–186 (2012).
Berti, M. et al. Sequential role of RAD51 paralog complexes in replication fork remodeling and restart. Nat. Commun. 11, 3531 (2020).
Garcin, E. B. et al. Differential requirements for the RAD51 paralogs in genome repair and maintenance in human cells. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008355 (2019).
Lin, Z. G., Kong, H. Z., Nei, M. & Ma, H. Origins and evolution of the recA/RAD51 gene family: Evidence for ancient gene duplication and endosymbiotic gene transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10328–10333 (2006).
Baumann, P., Benson, F. E. & West, S. C. Human RAD51 protein promotes ATP-dependent homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Cell 87, 757–766 (1996).
Benson, F. E., Stasiak, A. & West, S. C. Purification and characterisation of the human RAD51 protein, an analogue of E. coli RecA. EMBO J. 13, 5764–5771 (1994).
Sung, P. & Robberson, D. L. DNA strand exchange mediated by a RAD51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament with polarity opposite to that of RecA. Cell 82, 453–461 (1995).
Xu, J. et al. Cryo-EM structures of human RAD51 recombinase filaments during catalysis of DNA-strand exchange. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 40–46 (2017).
Lee, J. Y. et al. Base triplet stepping by the Rad51/RecA family of recombinases. Science 349, 977–981 (2015).
Chen, Z. C., Yang, H. J. & Pavletich, N. P. Mechanism of homologous recombination from the RecA–ssDNA/dsDNA structures. Nature 453, 489–494 (2008).
Short, J. M. et al. High-resolution structure of the presynaptic RAD51 filament on single-stranded DNA by electron cryo-microscopy. Nucl. Acids Res. 44, 9017–9030 (2016).
Sung, P. & Klein, H. Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 739–750 (2006).
Chen, P. L. et al. The BRC repeats in BRCA2 are critical for RAD51 binding and resistance to methyl methanesulfonate treatment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5287–5292 (1998).
Davies, A. A. et al. Role of BRCA2 in control of the RAD51 recombination and DNA repair protein. Mol. Cell 7, 273–282 (2001).
Yang, H. J. et al. BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2–DSS1–ssDNA structure. Science 297, 1837–1848 (2002).
Pellegrini, L. et al. Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51–BRCA2 complex. Nature 420, 287–293 (2002).
Jensen, R. B., Carreira, A. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination. Nature 467, 678–683 (2010).
Thorslund, T. et al. The breast cancer tumour suppressor BRCA2 promotes the specific targeting of RAD51 to single-stranded DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1263–1265 (2010).
Esashi, F. et al. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nature 434, 598–604 (2005).
Esashi, F., Galkin, V. E., Yu, X., Egelman, E. H. & West, S. C. Stabilisation of RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments by the C-terminal region of BRCA2. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 468–474 (2007).
Shahid, T. et al. Structure and mechanism of action of the BRCA2 breast cancer tumour suppressor. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 962–968 (2014).
Xia, B. et al. Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol. Cell 22, 719–729 (2006).
Zhang, F. et al. PALB2 links BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the DNA-damage response. Curr. Biol. 19, 524–529 (2009).
Buisson, R. et al. Cooperation of breast cancer proteins PALB2 and piccolo BRCA2 in stimulating homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1247–1254 (2010).
Masson, J.-Y. et al. Identification and purification of two distinct complexes containing the five RAD51 paralogs. Genes Dev. 15, 3296–3307 (2001).
Liu, J. et al. Rad51 paralogues Rad55–Rad57 balance the antirecombinase Srs2 in Rad51 filament formation. Nature 479, 245–248 (2011).
Belan, O. et al. Single-molecule analysis reveals cooperative stimulation of Rad51 filament nucleation and growth by mediator proteins. Mol. Cell 81, 1058–1073 (2021).
Roy, U. et al. The Rad51 paralog complex Rad55–Rad57 acts as a molecular chaperone during homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 81, 1043–1057 (2021).
Amunugama, R. et al. RAD51 protein ATP cap regulates nucleoprotein filament stability. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 8724–8736 (2012).
Miller, K. A., Sawicka, D., Barsky, D. & Albala, J. S. Domain mapping of the RAD51 paralog protein complexes. Nucl. Acids Res. 32, 169–178 (2004).
Yang, H., Zhou, C., Dhar, A. & Pavletich, N. P. Mechanism of strand exchange from RecA–DNA synaptic and D-loop structures. Nature 586, 801–806 (2020).
Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucl. Acids Res. 46, D1062–D1067 (2018).
Lacabanne, D. et al. ATP analogues for structural investigations: Case studies of a DnaB helicase and an ABC transporter. Molecules 25, 5268 (2020).
Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at BioxRiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2023).
Anand, R. et al. HELQ is a dual-function DSB repair enzyme modulated by RPA and RAD51. Nature 601, 268–273 (2022).
Hegner, M., Smith, S. B. & Bustamante, C. Polymerization and mechanical properties of single RecA–DNA filaments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10109–10114 (1999).
Baumann, P. & West, S. C. The human RAD51 protein: polarity of strand transfer and stimulation by hRP-A. EMBO J. 16, 5198–5206 (1997).
Subramanyam, S., Ismail, M., Bhattacharya, I. & Spies, M. Tyrosine phosphorylation stimulates activity of human RAD51 recombinase through altered nucleoprotein filament dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6045–6054 (2016).
Sano, K., Maeda, K., Oki, M. & Maeda, Y. Enhancement of protein expression in insect cells by a lobster tropomyosin cDNA leader sequence. FEBS Lett. 532, 143–146 (2002).
Weissmann, F. et al. biGBac enables rapid gene assembly for the expression of large multisubunit protein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2564–2569 (2016).
Yin, J. et al. Genetically encoded short peptide tag for versatile protein labeling by Sfp phosphopantetheinyl transferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15815–15820 (2005).
Hitchman, R. B., Siaterli, E. A., Nixon, C. P. & King, L. A. Quantitative real-time PCR for rapid and accurate titration of recombinant baculovirus particles. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 96, 810–814 (2007).
Theile, C. S. et al. Site-specific N-terminal labeling of proteins using sortase-mediated reactions. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1800–1807 (2013).
Liu, Y., Tarsounas, M., O’Regan, P. & West, S. C. Role of RAD51C and XRCC3 in genetic recombination and DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 1973–1979 (2007).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Silva, J. C. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis by accurate mass retention time pairs. Anal. Chem. 77, 2187–2200 (2005).
Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucl. Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014).
Chen, Y. et al. PremPS: predicting the impact of missense mutations on protein stability. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008543 (2020).
Laskowski, R. A., Jablonska, J., Pravda, L., Varekova, R. S. & Thornton, J. M. PDBsum: Structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Sci. 27, 129–134 (2018).
Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 54, 5.6.1–5.6.37 (2016).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Ho, H. N. & West, S. C. Generation of double Holliday junctiom DNAs and their dissolution/resolution within a chromatin context. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2123420119 (2022).
Wagner, T. et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Commun. Biol. 2, 218 (2019).
Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J 478, 4169–4185 (2021).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D 75, 861–877 (2019).
Casanal, A., Lohkamp, B. & Emsley, P. Current developments in Coot for macromolecular model building of electron cryo-microscopy and crystallographic data. Protein Sci. 29, 1069–1078 (2020).
More News
Could bird flu in cows lead to a human outbreak? Slow response worries scientists
US halts funding to controversial virus-hunting group: what researchers think
How high-fat diets feed breast cancer