Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C. & Kawato, M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 338–347 (1998).
Ebner, T. J. & Pasalar, S. Cerebellum predicts the future motor state. Cerebellum 7, 583–588 (2008).
Strick, P. L., Dum, R. P. & Fiez, J. A. Cerebellum and nonmotor function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 413–434 (2009).
Koziol, L. F. et al. Consensus paper: the cerebellum’s role in movement and cognition. Cerebellum 13, 151–177 (2014).
Schmahmann, J. D. Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 16, 367–378 (2004).
Wagner, M. J. & Luo, L. Neocortex–cerebellum circuits for cognitive processing. Trends Neurosci. 43, 42–54 (2020).
Cayco-Gajic, N. A. & Silver, R. A. Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation. Neuron 101, 584–602 (2019).
Marr, D. A theory of cerebellar cortex. J. Physiol. 202, 437–470 (1969).
Albus, J. S. A theory of cerebellar function. Math. Biosci. 10, 25–61 (1971).
Babadi, B. & Sompolinsky, H. Sparseness and expansion in sensory representations. Neuron 83, 1213–1226 (2014).
Billings, G., Piasini, E., Lőrincz, A., Nusser, Z. & Silver, R. A. Network structure within the cerebellar input layer enables lossless sparse encoding. Neuron 83, 960–974 (2014).
Cayco-Gajic, N. A., Clopath, C. & Silver, R. A. Sparse synaptic connectivity is required for decorrelation and pattern separation in feedforward networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 1116 (2017).
Litwin-Kumar, A., Harris, K. D., Axel, R., Sompolinsky, H. & Abbott, L. F. Optimal degrees of synaptic connectivity. Neuron 93, 1153–1164.e7 (2017).
Eccles, J. C., Ito, M. & Szentagothai, J. The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine (Springer–Verlag, 1967).
Palay, S. L. & Chan-Palay, V. Cerebellar Cortex: Cytology and Organization (Springer–Verlag, 1974).
Liu, A. & Regehr, W. G. Normalization of input patterns in an associative network. J. Neurophysiol. 111, 544–551 (2014).
Walter, J. T. & Khodakhah, K. The advantages of linear information processing for cerebellar computation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4471–4476 (2009).
Ohmae, S. & Medina, J. F. Climbing fibers encode a temporal-difference prediction error during cerebellar learning in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1798–1803 (2015).
Heffley, W. et al. Coordinated cerebellar climbing fiber activity signals learned sensorimotor predictions. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1431–1441 (2018).
Sanger, T. D., Yamashita, O. & Kawato, M. Expansion coding and computation in the cerebellum: 50 years after the Marr–Albus codon theory. J. Physiol. 598, 913–928 (2020).
Cao, Y., Geddes, T. A., Yang, J. Y. H. & Yang, P. Ensemble deep learning in bioinformatics. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 500–508 (2020).
Bell, C. C., Han, V. & Sawtell, N. B. Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 1–24 (2008).
Stevens, C. F. What the fly’s nose tells the fly’s brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9460–9465 (2015).
Eichler, K. et al. The complete connectome of a learning and memory centre in an insect brain. Nature 548, 175–182 (2017).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Houston, C. M. et al. Exploring the significance of morphological diversity for cerebellar granule cell excitability. Sci. Rep. 7, 46147 (2017).
Sultan, F. Distribution of mossy fibre rosettes in the cerebellum of cat and mice: evidence for a parasagittal organization at the single fibre level. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 2123–2130 (2001).
Gilmer, J. I. & Person, A. L. Morphological constraints on cerebellar granule cell combinatorial diversity. J. Neurosci. 37, 12153–12166 (2017).
Knogler, L. D., Markov, D. A., Dragomir, E. I., Štih, V. & Portugues, R. Sensorimotor representations in cerebellar granule cells in larval zebrafish are dense, spatially organized, and non-temporally patterned. Curr. Biol. 27, 1288–1302 (2017).
Wagner, M. J., Kim, T. H., Savall, J., Schnitzer, M. J. & Luo, L. Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward. Nature 544, 96–100 (2017).
Giovannucci, A. et al. Cerebellar granule cells acquire a widespread predictive feedback signal during motor learning. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 727–734 (2017).
Heck, D. H., Thach, W. T. & Keating, J. G. On-beam synchrony in the cerebellum as the mechanism for the timing and coordination of movement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7658–7663 (2007).
de Solages, C. et al. High-frequency organization and synchrony of activity in the purkinje cell layer of the cerebellum. Neuron 58, 775–788 (2008).
Wise, A. K., Cerminara, N. L., Marple-Horvat, D. E. & Apps, R. Mechanisms of synchronous activity in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J. Physiol. 588, 2373–2390 (2010).
Harvey, R. J. & Napper, R. M. A. Quantitatives studies on the mammalian cerebellum. Prog. Neurobiol. 36, 437–463 (1991).
Napper, R. M. & Harvey, R. J. Number of parallel fiber synapses on an individual Purkinje cell in the cerebellum of the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 274, 168–177 (1988).
Isope, P. & Barbour, B. Properties of unitary granule cell→Purkinje cell synapses in adult rat cerebellar slices. J. Neurosci. 22, 9668–9678 (2002).
Lanore, F., Cayco-Gajic, N. A., Gurnani, H., Coyle, D. & Silver, R. A. Cerebellar granule cell axons support high-dimensional representations. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1142–1150 (2021).
Dittman, J. S., Kreitzer, A. C. & Regehr, W. G. Interplay between facilitation, depression, and residual calcium at three presynaptic terminals. J. Neurosci. 20, 1374–1385 (2000).
Huang, C.-C. et al. Convergence of pontine and proprioceptive streams onto multimodal cerebellar granule cells. eLife 2, e00400 (2013).
Chabrol, F. P., Arenz, A., Wiechert, M. T., Margrie, T. W. & DiGregorio, D. A. Synaptic diversity enables temporal coding of coincident multisensory inputs in single neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 718–727 (2015).
Wagner, M. J. et al. Shared cortex–cerebellum dynamics in the execution and learning of a motor task. Cell 177, 669–682.e24 (2019).
Kuan, A. T. et al. Dense neuronal reconstruction through X-ray holographic nano-tomography. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1637–1643 (2020).
Zavitz, D., Amematsro, E. A., Borisyuk, A. & Caron, S. J. C. Connectivity patterns that shape olfactory representation in a mushroom body network model. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.10.430647 (2021).
Zheng, Z. et al. Structured sampling of olfactory input by the fly mushroom body. Curr. Biol. 32, 3334–3349.e6 (2022).
Guo, C. et al. Purkinje cells directly inhibit granule cells in specialized regions of the cerebellar cortex. Neuron 91, 1330–1341 (2016).
Rowan, M. J. M. et al. Graded control of climbing-fiber-mediated plasticity and learning by inhibition in the cerebellum. Neuron 99, 999–1015.e6 (2018).
Kozareva, V. et al. A transcriptomic atlas of mouse cerebellar cortex comprehensively defines cell types. Nature 598, 214–219 (2021).
Osorno, T. et al. Candelabrum cells are ubiquitous cerebellar cortex interneurons with specialized circuit properties. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 702–713 (2022).
Gao, Z. et al. A cortico-cerebellar loop for motor planning. Nature 563, 113–116 (2018).
Hua, Y., Laserstein, P. & Helmstaedter, M. Large-volume en-bloc staining for electron microscopy-based connectomics. Nat. Commun. 6, 7923 (2015).
Phelps, J. S. et al. Reconstruction of motor control circuits in adult Drosophila using automated transmission electron microscopy. Cell 184, 759–774.e18 (2021).
Deerinck, T. J., Bushong, E. A., Thor, A. & Ellisman, M. H. NCMIR methods for 3D EM: a new protocol for preparation of biological specimens for serial block face scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy 1, 6–8 (2010).
Saalfeld, S., Cardona, A., Hartenstein, V. & Tomancak, P. CATMAID: collaborative annotation toolkit for massive amounts of image data. Bioinformatics 25, 1984–1986 (2009).
Funke, J. et al. Large scale image segmentation with structured loss based deep learning for connectome reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 41, 1669–1680 (2018).
Sheridan, A. et al. Local shape descriptors for neuron segmentation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.18.427039 (2021).
Falk, T. et al. U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat. Methods 16, 67–70 (2018).
Lee, K., Zung, J., Li, P., Jain, V. & Seung, H. S. Superhuman accuracy on the SNEMI3D connectomics challenge. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.00120 (2017).
Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1226–1232 (2019).
Nguyen, T., Malin-Mayor, C., Patton, W. & Funke, J. Daisy: block-wise task dependencies for luigi. https://github.com/funkelab/daisy (2022).
Buhmann, J. et al. Automatic detection of synaptic partners in a whole-brain Drosophila electron microscopy data set. Nat. Methods 18, 771–774 (2021).
Boergens, K. M. et al. webKnossos: efficient online 3D data annotation for connectomics. Nat. Methods 14, 691–694 (2017).
Scheffer, L. K. et al. A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain. eLife 9, e57443 (2020).
Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J. & Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 226–231 (AAAI Press, 1996).
Hamming, R. W. Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 29, 147–160 (1950).
Dhar, M., Hantman, A. W. & Nishiyama, H. Developmental pattern and structural factors of dendritic survival in cerebellar granule cells in vivo. Sci Rep. 8, 17561 (2018).
Tyrrell, T. & Willshaw, D. Cerebellar cortex: its simulation and the relevance of Marr’s theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 336, 239–257 (1992).
Gundappa-Sulur, G., De Schutter, E. & Bower, J. M. Ascending granule cell axon: an important component of cerebellar cortical circuitry. J. Comp. Neurol. 408, 580–596 (1999).
Huang, C.-M., Wang, L. & Huang, R. H. Cerebellar granule cell: ascending axon and parallel fiber. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 1731–1737 (2006).
Walter, J. T., Dizon, M.-J. & Khodakhah, K. The functional equivalence of ascending and parallel fiber inputs in cerebellar computation. J. Neurosci. 29, 8462–8473 (2009).
Bradbury, J. et al. JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs. https://github.com/google/jax (2018).
Hennigan, T., Cai, T., Norman, T. & Babuschkin, I. Haiku: Sonnet for JAX. https://github.com/deepmind/dm-haiku (2020).
Babuschkin, I. et al. The DeepMind JAX Ecosystem. http://github.com/deepmind (2020).
Ito, M. The molecular organization of cerebellar long-term depression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 896–902 (2002).
More News
A deconstruction-reconstruction strategy for pyrimidine diversification – Nature
‘Orangutan, heal thyself’: First wild animal seen using medicinal plant
UTIs make life miserable — scientists are finding new ways to tackle them