April 25, 2024
Subtype-specific 3D genome alteration in acute myeloid leukaemia – Nature

Subtype-specific 3D genome alteration in acute myeloid leukaemia – Nature

  • Dohner, H. et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 129, 424–447 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dohner, H., Weisdorf, D. J. & Bloomfield, C. D. Acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1136–1152 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arber, D. A. et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127, 2391–2405 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Papaemmanuil, E. et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 2209–2221 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Assi, S. A. et al. Subtype-specific regulatory network rewiring in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Genet. 51, 151–162 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McKeown, M. R. et al. Superenhancer analysis defines novel epigenomic subtypes of non-APL AML, including an RARα dependency targetable by SY-1425, a potent and selective RARα agonist. Cancer Discov. 7, 1136–1153 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harris, W. J. et al. The histone demethylase KDM1A sustains the oncogenic potential of MLL-AF9 leukemia stem cells. Cancer Cell 21, 473–487 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luo, H. et al. CTCF boundary remodels chromatin domain and drives aberrant HOX gene transcription in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 132, 837–848 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghasemi, R., Struthers, H., Wilson, E. R. & Spencer, D. H. Contribution of CTCF binding to transcriptional activity at the HOXA locus in NPM1-mutant AML cells. Leukemia 35, 404–416 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yan, J. et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation modulates long-range chromatin interactions at enhancers. Cell Res. 28, 204–220 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320.e24 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Viny, A. D. et al. Cohesin members Stag1 and Stag2 display distinct roles in chromatin accessibility and topological control of HSC self-Renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 25, 682–696.e8 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, M. et al. Proteogenomics and Hi-C reveal transcriptional dysregulation in high hyperdiploid childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Commun. 10, 1519 (2019).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diaz, N. et al. Chromatin conformation analysis of primary patient tissue using a low input Hi-C method. Nat. Commun. 9, 4938 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kloetgen, A. et al. Three-dimensional chromatin landscapes in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 52, 388–400 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, H. et al. Noncoding genetic variation in GATA3 increases acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk through local and global changes in chromatin conformation. Nat. Genet. 54, 170–179 (2022).

  • Dixon, J. R. et al. Integrative detection and analysis of structural variation in cancer genomes. Nat. Genet. 50, 1388–1398 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Groschel, S. et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell 157, 369–381 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Northcott, P. A. et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spassov, B. V. et al. Wilms’ tumor protein and FLT3-internal tandem duplication expression in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology 16, 37–42 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sondka, Z. et al. The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 696–705 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Metzeler, K. H. et al. Spectrum and prognostic relevance of driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 128, 686–698 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akdemir, K. C. et al. Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer. Nat. Genet. 52, 294–305 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salameh, T. J. et al. A supervised learning framework for chromatin loop detection in genome-wide contact maps. Nat. Commun. 11, 3428 (2020).

  • Jaatinen, T. et al. Global gene expression profile of human cord blood-derived CD133+ cells. Stem Cells 24, 631–641 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diaz-Blanco, E. et al. Molecular signature of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of patients with CML in chronic phase. Leukemia 21, 494–504 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ngan, C. Y. et al. Chromatin interaction analyses elucidate the roles of PRC2-bound silencers in mouse development. Nat. Genet. 52, 264–272 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cai, Y. et al. H3K27me3-rich genomic regions can function as silencers to repress gene expression via chromatin interactions. Nat. Commun. 12, 719 (2021).

  • Kataoka, K. et al. Integrated molecular analysis of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 47, 1304–1315 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldman, M. J. et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 675–678 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vian, L. et al. The energetics and physiological impact of cohesin extrusion. Cell 173, 1165–1178.e20 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morris, V. A., Cummings, C. L., Korb, B., Boaglio, S. & Oehler, V. G. Deregulated KLF4 expression in myeloid leukemias alters cell proliferation and differentiation through microRNA and gene targets. Mol. Cell. Biol. 36, 559–573 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, X. et al. Genome-wide detection of enhancer-hijacking events from chromatin interaction data in rearranged genomes. Nat. Methods 18, 661–668 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Phanstiel, D. H. et al. Static and dynamic DNA loops form AP-1-bound activation hubs during macrophage development. Mol. Cell 67, 1037–1048.e6 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Joung, J. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR–Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening. Nat. Protoc. 12, 828–863 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Achinger-Kawecka, J. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming at estrogen-receptor binding sites alters 3D chromatin landscape in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 320 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bell, A. C. & Felsenfeld, G. Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature 405, 482–485 (2000).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Figueroa, M. E. et al. DNA methylation signatures identify biologically distinct subtypes in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 17, 13–27 (2010).

    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flavahan, W. A. et al. Altered chromosomal topology drives oncogenic programs in SDH-deficient GISTs. Nature 575, 229–233 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flavahan, W. A. et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 529, 110–114 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tovy, A. et al. Tissue-biased expansion of DNMT3A-mutant clones in a mosaic individual is associated with conserved epigenetic erosion. Cell Stem Cell 27, 326–335.e4 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. Large DNA methylation nadirs anchor chromatin loops maintaining hematopoietic stem cell identity. Mol. Cell 78, 506–521.e6 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akalin, A. et al. Base-pair resolution DNA methylation sequencing reveals profoundly divergent epigenetic landscapes in acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002781 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neri, F. et al. Intragenic DNA methylation prevents spurious transcription initiation. Nature 543, 72–77 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456–E6465 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, T. et al. HiCRep: assessing the reproducibility of Hi-C data using a stratum-adjusted correlation coefficient. Genome Res. 27, 1939–1949 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spracklin, G. et al. Heterochromatin diversity modulates genome compartmentalization and loop extrusion barriers. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.455340 (2021).

  • Cesana, D. et al. Retrieval of vector integration sites from cell-free DNA. Nat. Med. 27, 1458–1470 (2021).

    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loke, J. et al. RUNX1-ETO and RUNX1-EVI1 differentially reprogram the chromatin landscape in t(8;21) and t(3;21) AML. Cell Rep. 19, 1654–1668 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1930 (2019).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109, 21.29.1–21.29.9 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Diao, Y. et al. A tiling-deletion-based genetic screen for cis-regulatory element identification in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 14, 629–635 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bolland, D. J., King, M. R., Reik, W., Corcoran, A. E. & Krueger, C. Robust 3D DNA FISH using directly labeled probes. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/50587 (2013).

  • Riccardi, C., & Nicoletti, I. Analysis of apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1458–1461 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tarasov, A., Vilella, A. J., Cuppen, E., Nijman, I. J. & Prins, P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics 31, 2032–2034 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6, 80–92 (2012).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rausch, T. et al. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics 28, i333–i339 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiang, C. et al. SpeedSeq: ultra-fast personal genome analysis and interpretation. Nat. Methods 12, 966–968 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abdennur, N. & Mirny, L. A. Cooler: scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics 36, 311–316 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kerpedjiev, P. et al. HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol. 19, 125 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. The 3D Genome Browser: a web-based browser for visualizing 3D genome organization and long-range chromatin interactions. Genome Biol. 19, 151 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dixon, J. R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331–336 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Varoquaux, N., Ay, F., Noble, W. S. & Vert, J. P. A statistical approach for inferring the 3D structure of the genome. Bioinformatics 30, i26–i33 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schultz, M. D. et al. Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature 523, 212–216 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Corces, M. R. et al. The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science 362, eaav1898 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Juric, I. et al. MAPS: model-based analysis of long-range chromatin interactions from PLAC-seq and HiChIP experiments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006982 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knight, P. A. & Ruiz, D. A fast algorithm for matrix balancing. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 33, 1029–1047 (2012).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link