May 9, 2024
The risks of overstating the climate benefits of ecosystem restoration – Nature

The risks of overstating the climate benefits of ecosystem restoration – Nature

  • IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014).

  • IPBES. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  • Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Erb, K.-H. et al. Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass. Nature 553, 73–76 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • ESA CCI. Land Cover CCI Climate Research Data Package (2017); https://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php

  • Poulter, B. et al. Plant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency’s Land Cover Climate Change Initiative. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 2315–2328 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zomer, R. J. et al. Global tree cover and biomass carbon on agricultural land: the contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Sci. Rep. 6, 29987 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 48–56 (2006).

  • Friedlingstein, P., Allen, M., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P. & Seneviratne, S. I. Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”. Science 366, eaay8060 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bastin, J.-F. et al. Erratum for the Report: “The global tree restoration potential” by J.-F. Bastin, Y. Finegold, C. Garcia, D. Mollicone, M. Rezende, D. Routh, C. M. Zohner, T. W. Crowther and for the Technical Response “Response to Comments on ‘The global tree restoration potential’” by J.-F. Bastin, Y. Finegold, C. Garcia, N. Gellie, A. Lowe, D. Mollicone, M. Rezende, D. Routh, M. Sacande, B. Sparrow, C. M. Zohner, T. W. Crowther. Science 368, eabc8905 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Author Correction:Global priority areas forecosystem restoration. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05178-y (2022).

  • KC, S. & Lutz, W. The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 181–192 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331–345 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hasegawa, T. et al. Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 699–703 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doelman, J. C. et al. Afforestation for climate change mitigation: potentials, risks and trade‐offs. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1576–1591 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link