Hofmann, K. P. et al. A G protein-coupled receptor at work: the rhodopsin model. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 540–552 (2009).
Schoenlein, R. W., Peteanu, L. A., Mathies, R. A. & Shank, C. V. The first step in vision: femtosecond isomerization of rhodopsin. Science 254, 412–415 (1991).
Branden, G. & Neutze, R. Advances and challenges in time-resolved macromolecular crystallography. Science 373, eaba0954 (2021).
Sakmar, T. P., Franke, R. R. & Khorana, H. G. Glutamic acid-113 serves as the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in bovine rhodopsin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8309–8313 (1989).
Palczewski, K. et al. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289, 739–745 (2000).
Terakita, A. et al. Counterion displacement in the molecular evolution of the rhodopsin family. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 284–289 (2004).
Kojima, K. et al. Evolutionary steps involving counterion displacement in a tunicate opsin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6028–6033 (2017).
Terakita, A., Yamashita, T. & Shichida, Y. Highly conserved glutamic acid in the extracellular IV-V loop in rhodopsins acts as the counterion in retinochrome, a member of the rhodopsin family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14263–14267 (2000).
Nakamichi, H. & Okada, T. Local peptide movement in the photoreaction intermediate of rhodopsin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12729–12734 (2006).
Nakamichi, H. & Okada, T. Crystallographic analysis of primary visual photochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45, 4270–4273 (2006).
Standfuss, J. et al. The structural basis of agonist-induced activation in constitutively active rhodopsin. Nature 471, 656–660 (2011).
Choe, H. W., Park, J. H., Kim, Y. J. & Ernst, O. P. Transmembrane signaling by GPCRs: insight from rhodopsin and opsin structures. Neuropharmacology 60, 52–57 (2011).
Deupi, X. et al. Stabilized G protein binding site in the structure of constitutively active metarhodopsin-II. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 119–124 (2012).
Gozem, S., Luk, H. L., Schapiro, I. & Olivucci, M. Theory and simulation of the ultrafast double-bond isomerization of biological chromophores. Chem. Rev. 117, 13502–13565 (2017).
Ernst, O. P. et al. Microbial and animal rhodopsins: structures, functions, and molecular mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 114, 126–163 (2014).
Schnedermann, C. et al. Evidence for a vibrational phase-dependent isotope effect on the photochemistry of vision. Nat. Chem. 10, 449–455 (2018).
Yang, X. et al. Quantum-classical simulations of rhodopsin reveal excited-state population splitting and its effects on quantum efficiency. Nat. Chem. 14, 441–449 (2022).
Moffat, K. The frontiers of time-resolved macromolecular crystallography: movies and chirped X-ray pulses. Faraday Discuss. 122, 65–77 (2003).
Barends, T. R. et al. Direct observation of ultrafast collective motions in CO myoglobin upon ligand dissociation. Science 350, 445–450 (2015).
Tenboer, J. et al. Time-resolved serial crystallography captures high-resolution intermediates of photoactive yellow protein. Science 346, 1242–1246 (2014).
Pande, K. et al. Femtosecond structural dynamics drives the trans/cis isomerization in photoactive yellow protein. Science 352, 725–729 (2016).
Coquelle, N. et al. Chromophore twisting in the excited state of a photoswitchable fluorescent protein captured by time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography. Nat. Chem. 10, 31–37 (2018).
Claesson, E. et al. The primary structural photoresponse of phytochrome proteins captured by a femtosecond X-ray laser. eLife 9, e53514 (2020).
Nogly, P. et al. Retinal isomerization in bacteriorhodopsin captured by a femtosecond x-ray laser. Science 361, eaat0094 (2018).
Nass Kovacs, G. et al. Three-dimensional view of ultrafast dynamics in photoexcited bacteriorhodopsin. Nat. Commun. 10, 3177 (2019).
Skopintsev, P. et al. Femtosecond-to-millisecond structural changes in a light-driven sodium pump. Nature 583, 314–318 (2020).
Mous, S. et al. Dynamics and mechanism of a light-driven chloride pump. Science 375, 845–851 (2022).
Dods, R. et al. Ultrafast structural changes within a photosynthetic reaction centre. Nature 589, 310–314 (2021).
Aller, P. & Orville, A. M. Dynamic structural biology experiments at XFEL or synchrotron sources. Methods Mol. Biol. 2305, 203–228 (2021).
Wranik, M.et al. Watching the release of a photopharmacological drug from tubulin using time-resolved serial crystallography. Nat. Commun. 14, 903 (2023).
Grunbein, M. L. et al. Illumination guidelines for ultrafast pump-probe experiments by serial femtosecond crystallography. Nat. Methods 17, 681–684 (2020).
Miller, R. J. D., Pare-Labrosse, O., Sarracini, A. & Besaw, J. E. Three-dimensional view of ultrafast dynamics in photoexcited bacteriorhodopsin in the multiphoton regime and biological relevance. Nat. Commun. 11, 1240 (2020).
Barends, T. R. M. et al. Influence of pump laser fluence on ultrafast structural changes in myoglobin. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.22.517513 (2022).
Caffrey, M. Crystallizing membrane proteins for structure determination: use of lipidic mesophases. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 38, 29–51 (2009).
Fotiadis, D. et al. Structure of the rhodopsin dimer: a working model for G-protein-coupled receptors. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 252–259 (2006).
Rodrigues, J. R., Casadei C. M., Weinert T., Panneels, V. & Schertler, G. F. X. Correction of rhodopsin serial crystallography diffraction intensities for a lattice-translocation defect. Acta Crystallogr. D 79, 224–233 (2023).
Li, J., Edwards, P. C., Burghammer, M., Villa, C. & Schertler, G. F. Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1409–1438 (2004).
Yan, E. C. et al. Retinal counterion switch in the photoactivation of the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9262–9267 (2003).
Kimata, N. et al. Retinal orientation and interactions in rhodopsin reveal a two-stage trigger mechanism for activation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12683 (2016).
Yoshizawa, T. & Shichida, Y. Low-temperature spectrophotometry of intermediates of rhodopsin. Methods Enzymol. 81, 333–354 (1982).
Kukura, P., McCamant, D. W., Yoon, S., Wandschneider, D. B. & Mathies, R. A. Structural observation of the primary isomerization in vision with femtosecond-stimulated Raman. Science 310, 1006–1009 (2005).
Sakmar, T. P. Rhodopsin: a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 59, 1–34 (1998).
Lewis, J. W., Szundi, I., Kazmi, M. A., Sakmar, T. P. & Kliger, D. S. Time-resolved photointermediate changes in rhodopsin glutamic acid 181 mutants. Biochemistry 43, 12614–12621 (2004).
Edwards, C. et al. Thermal motion in protein crystals estimated using laser-generated ultrasound and Young’s modulus measurements. Acta Crystallogr. A 46, 315–320 (1990).
Nagata, T., Oura, T., Terakita, A., Kandori, H. & Shichida, Y. Isomer-specific interaction of the retinal chromophore with threonine-118 in rhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. 106, 1969–1975 (2002).
Yan, E. C. et al. Resonance Raman analysis of the mechanism of energy storage and chromophore distortion in the primary visual photoproduct. Biochemistry 43, 10867–10876 (2004).
Warshel, A. Bicycle-pedal model for the first step in the vision process. Nature 260, 678–683 (1976).
Andruniow, T., Ferre, N. & Olivucci, M. Structure, initial excited-state relaxation, and energy storage of rhodopsin resolved at the multiconfigurational perturbation theory level. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17908–17913 (2004).
Frutos, L. M., Andruniow, T., Santoro, F., Ferre, N. & Olivucci, M. Tracking the excited-state time evolution of the visual pigment with multiconfigurational quantum chemistry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7764–7769 (2007).
Sen, S., Kar, R. K., Borin, V. A. & Schapiro, I. Insight into the isomerization mechanism of retinal proteins from hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 12, e1562 (2022).
Randall, C. E. et al. A new photolysis intermediate in artificial and native visual pigments. JACS 113, 3473–3485 (1991).
Birge, R. R. & Vought, B. W. Energetics of rhodopsin photobleaching: photocalorimetric studies of energy storage in early and later intermediates. Methods Enzymol. 315, 143–163 (2000).
Karnik, S. S. & Khorana, H. G. Assembly of functional rhodopsin requires a disulfide bond between cysteine residues 110 and 187. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17520–17524 (1990).
Deupi, X. & Kobilka, B. K. Energy landscapes as a tool to integrate GPCR structure, dynamics, and function. Physiology 25, 293–303 (2010).
Venkatakrishnan, A. J. et al. Diverse activation pathways in class A GPCRs converge near the G-protein-coupling region. Nature 536, 484–487 (2016).
Hauser, A. S. et al. GPCR activation mechanisms across classes and macro/microscales. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 879–888 (2021).
Venkatakrishnan, A. J. et al. Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 494, 185–194 (2013).
Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A., Singh, J. & Thornton, J. M. Molecular recognition by proteins: protein-ligand interactions from a structural perspective. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24, 280–284 (1996).
Okada, T., Takeda, K. & Kouyama, T. Highly selective separation of rhodopsin from bovine rod outer segment membranes using combination of divalent cation and alkyl(thio)glucoside. Photochem. Photobiol. 67, 495–499 (1998).
Edwards, P. C. et al. Crystals of native and modified bovine rhodopsins and their heavy atom derivatives. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1439–1450 (2004).
Kissick, D. J., Wanapun, D. & Simpson, G. J. Second-order nonlinear optical imaging of chiral crystals. Ann. Rev. Anal. Chem. 4, 419–437 (2011).
James, D. et al. Improving high viscosity extrusion of microcrystals for time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography at X-ray lasers. J. Vis. Exp. 144, e59087 (2019).
Tono, K. et al. Diverse application platform for hard X-ray diffraction in SACLA (DAPHNIS): application to serial protein crystallography using an X-ray free-electron laser. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 532–537 (2015).
Shimazu, Y. et al. High-viscosity sample-injection device for serial femtosecond crystallography at atmospheric pressure. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 52, 1280–1288 (2019).
Arnlund, D. et al. Visualizing a protein quake with time-resolved X-ray scattering at a free-electron laser. Nat. Methods 11, 923–926 (2014).
Leslie, A. G. The integration of macromolecular diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 48–57 (2006).
Duisenberg, A. Indexing in single-crystal diffractometry with an obstinate list of reflections. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25, 92–96 (1992).
Gevorkov, Y. et al. XGANDALF—extended gradient descent algorithm for lattice finding. Acta Crystallogr. A 75, 694–704 (2019).
White, T. A. et al. CrystFEL: a software suite for snapshot serial crystallography. J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 335–334 (2012).
White, T. A. Processing serial crystallography data with CrystFEL: a step-by-step guide. Acta Crystallogr. D 75, 219–233 (2019).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1948–1954 (2002).
Wang, J., Kamtekar, S., Berman, A. J. & Steitz, T. A. Correction of X-ray intensities from single crystals containing lattice-translocation defects. Acta Crystallogr. D 61, 67–74 (2005).
Okada, T. et al. The retinal conformation and its environment in rhodopsin in light of a new 2.2 Å crystal structure. J. Mol. Biol. 342, 571–583 (2004).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D 75, 861–877 (2019).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
Lebedev, A. A. et al. JLigand: a graphical tool for the CCP4 template-restraint library. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 431–440 (2012).
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760–763 (1994).
Wickstrand, C. et al. A tool for visualizing protein motions in time-resolved crystallography. Struct. Dyn. 7, 024701 (2020).
Pandey, S. et al. Time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography at the European XFEL. Nat. Methods 17, 73–78 (2020).
Ballesteros, A. & Weinstein, H. Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci. 25, 366–428 (1995).
Olsson, M. H., Sondergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J. H. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 525–537 (2011).
Sondergaard, C. R., Olsson, M. H., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J. H. Improved treatment of ligands and coupling effects in empirical calculation and rationalization of pKa values. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 2284–2295 (2011).
Case, D. A. et al. Amber 2021 (Univ. California, San Francisco, 2021).
Senn, H. M. & Thiel, W. QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48, 1198–1229 (2009).
Field, M. J., Bash, P. A. & Karplus, M. A combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical potential for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 11, 700–733 (1990).
Becke, A. D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098–3100 (1988)
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory J. Comput. Chem. 32 1456–1465 (2011).
Dunning, T. H. Jr. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007–1023 (1989).
Weigend, F. Hartree–Fock exchange fitting basis sets for H to Rn. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 167–175 (2008).
Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713 (2015).
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983)
Neese, F. The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2, 73–78 (2012).
Sherwood, P. e al. QUASI: a general purpose implementation of the QM/MM approach and its application to problems in catalysis. J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 632, 1–28 (2003).
Metz, S., Kästner, J., Sokol, A. A., Keal, T. W. & Sherwood, P. ChemShell—a modular software package for QM / MM simulations. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 101–110 (2014).
Hättig, C. Structure optimizations for excited states with correlated second-order methods: CC2 and ADC(2). Adv. Quantum Chem. 50, 37–60 (2005).
Furche, F. et al. Turbomole. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 91–100 (2014).
Rodriguez-Espigares, I. et al. GPCRmd uncovers the dynamics of the 3D-GPCRome. Nat. Methods 17, 777–787 (2020).
Gowers, R. et al. MDAnalysis: a Python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations, https://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2016/oliver_beckstein.html (2019).
Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011).
Aquila, A. et al. Time-resolved protein nanocrystallography using an X-ray free-electron laser. Opt. Express 20, 2706–2716 (2012).
Gorel, A., Schlichting, I. & Barends, T. R. M. Discerning best practices in XFEL-based biological crystallography—standards for nonstandard experiments. IUCrJ 8, 532–543 (2021).
Neutze, R., Wouts, R., van der Spoel, D., Weckert, E. & Hajdu, J. Potential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nature 406, 752–757 (2000).
Nakayama, T. A. & Khorana, H. G. Mapping of the amino acids in membrane-embedded helices that interact with the retinal chromophore in bovine rhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 4269–4275 (1991).
Varma, N. et al. Crystal structure of jumping spider rhodopsin-1 as a light sensitive GPCR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14547–14556 (2019).
More News
Daily briefing: The origins of bioluminescence in animals date back over half a billion years
Daily briefing: How an unlikely friendship with Jung influenced Pauli’s physics
Audio long read: Why loneliness is bad for your health