Friesner, R. A. Ab initio quantum chemistry: methodology and applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6648–6653 (2005).
Helgaker, T., Klopper, W. & Tew, D. P. Quantitative quantum chemistry. Mol. Phys. 106, 2107–2143 (2008).
Cao, Y. et al. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chem. Rev. 119, 10856–10915 (2019).
Bauer, B., Bravyi, S., Motta, M. & Kin-Lic Chan, G. Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science. Chem. Rev. 120, 12685–12717 (2020).
Acioli, P. H. Review of quantum Monte Carlo methods and their applications. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 394, 75–85 (1997).
Foulkes, W. M. C., Mitas, L., Needs, R. J. & Rajagopal, G. Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 33 (2001).
Peruzzo, A. et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
McClean, J. R., Romero, J., Babbush, R. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. New J. Phys. 18, 23023 (2016).
Feynman, R. P. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–488 (1982).
Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073–1078 (1996).
Shor, P. W. in Proc. 37th Conf. on Foundations of Computer Science 56–65 (IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, 1996).
Preskill, J. Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.5813 (2012).
McArdle, S. et al. Variational ansatzbased quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 75 (2019).
Motta, M. et al. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution. Nat. Phys. 16, 205–210 (2020).
Kandala, A. et al. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature 549, 242–246 (2017).
Nam, Y. et al. Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped-ion quantum computer. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 33 (2020).
Google AI Quantum et al. Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer. Science 369, 1084–1089 (2020).
Troyer, M. & Wiese, U.-J. Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005).
Blankenbecler, R., Scalapino, D. J. & Sugar, R. L. Monte Carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion systems. I. Phys. Rev. D 24, 2278–2286 (1981).
Chang, C.-C., Gogolenko, S., Perez, J., Bai, Z. & Scalettar, R. T. Recent advances in determinant quantum Monte Carlo. Philos. Mag. 95, 1260–1281 (2015).
Mahajan, A. & Sharma, S. Taming the sign problem in auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo using accurate wave functions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 4786–4798 (2021).
Li, Z.-X. & Yao, H. Sign-problem-free fermionic quantum Monte Carlo: developments and applications. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 337–356 (2019).
Moskowitz, J. W., Schmidt, K. E., Lee, M. A. & Kalos, M. H. A new look at correlation energy in atomic and molecular systems. II. The application of the Green’s function Monte Carlo method to LiH. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 349–355 (1982).
Zhang, S., Carlson, J. & Gubernatis, J. E. Constrained path Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states. Phys. Rev. B 55, 7464 (1997).
Zhang, S. & Krakauer, H. Quantum Monte Carlo method using phase-free random walks with Slater determinants. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 136401 (2003).
Sorella, S. Linearized auxiliary fields Monte Carlo technique: efficient sampling of the fermion sign. Phys. Rev. B 84, 241110 (2011).
Becca, F. & Sorella, S. Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).
Bartlett, R. J., Kucharski, S. A. & Noga, J. Alternative coupled-cluster ansätze II. The unitary coupled-cluster method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 155, 133–140 (1989).
Ryabinkin, I. G., Yen, T.-C., Genin, S. N. & Izmaylov, A. F. Qubit coupled cluster method: a systematic approach to quantum chemistry on a quantum computer. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 6317–6326 (2018).
Ortiz, G., Gubernatis, J. E., Knill, E. & Laamme, R. Quantum algorithms for fermionic simulations. Phys. Rev. A 64, 022319 (2001).
Evenbly, G. & Vidal, G. Tensor network renormalization yields the multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 200401 (2015).
Goddard, W. A., Dunning, T. H., Hunt, W. J. & Hay, P. J. Generalized valence bond description of bonding in low-lying states of molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 6, 368–376 (1973).
Cullen, J. Generalized valence bond solutions from a constrained coupled cluster method. Chem. Phys. 202, 217–229 (1996).
Paldus, J., Piecuch, P., Pylypow, L. & Jeziorski, B. Application of Hilbert-space coupled-cluster theory to simple (H2)2 model systems: planar models. Phys. Rev. A 47, 2738–2782 (1993).
Lee, J., Huggins, W. J., Head-Gordon, M. & Birgitta Whaley, K. Generalized unitary coupled cluster wave functions for quantum computation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 311–324 (2019).
Hehre, W. J., Stewart, R. F. & Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. I. Use of Gaussian expansions of Slater-type atomic orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 51, 2657–2664 (1969).
Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007–1023 (1989).
Raghavachari, K., Trucks, G. W., Pople, J. A. & Head-Gordon, M. A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories. Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 479–483 (1989).
Takeshita, T. et al. Increasing the representation accuracy of quantum simulations of chemistry without extra quantum resources. Phys. Rev. X 10, 011004 (2020).
Siegbahn, P. E. M. The externally contracted CI method applied to N2. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 23, 1869–1889 (1983).
VandeVondele, J. & Hutter, J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 114105 (2007).
Yang, Y., Lu, B.-N. & Li, Y. Accelerated quantum Monte Carlo with mitigated error on noisy quantum computer. PRX Quantum 2, 040361 (2021).
Aaronson, S. Shadow tomography of quantum states. SIAM J. Comput. 49, STOC18-368–STOC18-394 (2020).
Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16, 1050–1057 (2020).
Zheng, B.-X. et al. Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional Hubbard model. Science 358, 1155–1160 (2017).
Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
Williams, K. T. et al. Direct comparison of many-body methods for realistic electronic hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. 10, 011041 (2020).
Chen, Z. et al. Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction. Nature 595, 383–387 (2021).
Epifanovsky, E. et al. Software for the frontiers of quantum chemistry: an overview of developments in the Q-Chem 5 package. J. Chem. Phys. 155, 084801 (2021).
More News
Author Correction: Stepwise activation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor – Nature
Changing rainforest to plantations shifts tropical food webs
Streamlined skull helps foxes take a nosedive