May 7, 2024
Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search – Nature

Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search – Nature

  • Wagner, C. et al. Measuring algorithmically infused societies. Nature 595, 197–204 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rahwan, I. et al. Machine behaviour. Nature 568, 477–486 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sunstein, C. R. Republic.com (Princeton Univ. Press, 2001).

  • Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W. & Starnini, M. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2023301118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J. Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the ‘post-truth’ era. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6, 353–369 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You (Penguin, 2011).

  • Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 1130–1132 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardenal, A. S., Aguilar-Paredes, C., Galais, C. & Pérez-Montoro, M. Digital technologies and selective exposure: how choice and filter bubbles shape news media exposure. Int. J. Press/Politics 24, 465–486 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A. & Nielsen, R. K. More diverse, more politically varied: how social media, search engines and aggregators shape news repertoires in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027393 (2021).

  • Ekström, A. G., Niehorster, D. C. & Olsson, E. J. Self-imposed filter bubbles: selective attention and exposure in online search. Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100226 (2022).

  • Hosseinmardi, H. et al. Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2101967118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, W., Pacheco, D., Yang, K.-C. & Menczer, F. Neutral bots probe political bias on social media. Nat. Commun. 12, 5580 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 472–480 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Allen, J., Howland, B., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D. & Watts, D. J. Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay3539 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Muise, D. et al. Quantifying partisan news diets in Web and TV audiences. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn0083 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garimella, K., Smith, T., Weiss, R. & West, R. Political polarization in online news consumption. Proc. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 15, 152–162 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hannak, A. et al. Measuring personalization of web search. In Proc. 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 527–538 https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488435 (ACM, 2013).

  • Metaxa, D., Park, J. S., Landay, J. A. & Hancock, J. Search media and elections: a longitudinal investigation of political search results. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 3, 129 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robertson, R. E. et al. Auditing partisan audience bias within Google Search. Proc. ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 2, 148 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Trielli, D. & Diakopoulos, N. Partisan search behavior and Google results in the 2018 U.S. midterm elections. Inf. Commun. Soc. 25, 145–161 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fischer, S., Jaidka, K. & Lelkes, Y. Auditing local news presence on Google News. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1236–1244 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kawakami, A., Umarova, K. & Mustafaraj, E. The media coverage of the 2020 US presidential election candidates through the lens of Google’s top stories. In Proc. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 14, 868–877 (AAAI, 2020).

  • Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B. & Lazer, D. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363, 374–378 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huszár, F. et al. Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 119, e2025334119 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lazer, D. M. J. et al. The science of fake news. Science 359, 1094–1096 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watts, D. J., Rothschild, D. M. & Mobius, M. Measuring the news and its impact on democracy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e1912443118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gillespie, T. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society 12, 347–364 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Political Sci. 50, 755–769 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iyengar, S. & Hahn, K. S. Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. J. Commun. 59, 19–39 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Introna, L. D. & Nissenbaum, H. Shaping the web: why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society 16, 169–185 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lawrence, S. & Giles, C. L. Accessibility of information on the web. Nature 400, 107–107 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Metaxas, P. T. & DeStefano, J. Web spam, propaganda and trust. In Proc. 2005 World Wide Web Conference (2005).

  • Vaidhyanathan, S. The Googlization of Everything (And Why We Should Worry) (Univ. of California Press, 2011).

  • Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31, 211–236 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A. & Neilsen, R. K. Digital News Report 2019 (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2019).

  • Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Shearer, E. & Lu, K. How Americans Encounter, Recall and Act Upon Digital News (Pew Research Center, 2017).

  • Edelman. Edelman Trust Barometer 2021 (2021).

  • Golebiewski, M. & Boyd, D. Data Voids: Where Missing Data can Easily be Exploited (Data & Society, 2019).

  • Tripodi, F. Searching for Alternative Facts: Analyzing Scriptural Inference in Conservative News Practices (Data & Society, 2018).

  • Epstein, R. & Robertson, R. E. The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112, E4512–E4521 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Epstein, R., Robertson, R. E., Lazer, D. & Wilson, C. Suppressing the search engine manipulation effect (SEME). Proc. ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 1, 42 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wojcieszak, M., Menchen-Trevino, E., Goncalves, J. F. F. & Weeks, B. Avenues to news and diverse news exposure online: comparing direct navigation, social media, news aggregators, search queries, and article hyperlinks. Int. J. Press/Politics 27, 860–886 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211009160.

  • Peterson, E., Goel, S. & Iyengar, S. Partisan selective exposure in online news consumption: evidence from the 2016 presidential campaign. Political Sci. Res. Methods 9, 242–258 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guess, A. M., Nagler, J. & Tucker, J. Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau4586 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yin, L. Local news dataset. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1345145 (2018).

  • Rating Process and Criteria. NewsGuard https://www.newsguardtech.com/ratings/rating-process-criteria/ (2021).

  • Mustafaraj, E., Lurie, E. & Devine, C. The case for voter-centered audits of search engines during political elections. In Proc. 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 559–569 (ACM, 2020).

  • van Hoof, M., Meppelink, C. S., Moeller, J. & Trilling, D. Searching differently? How political attitudes impact search queries about political issues. New Media & Society https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221104405 (2022).

  • Zuckerman, E. Why study media ecosystems? Inf. Commun. Soc. 24, 1495–1513 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hobbs, W. R. Text scaling for open-ended survey responses and social media posts. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3044864 (2019).

  • Flaxman, S., Goel, S. & Rao, J. M. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opin. Q. 80, 298–320 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klar, S. & Krupnikov, Y. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016).

  • Noble, S. U. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (New York Univ. Press, 2018).

  • Guess, A. M., Barberá, P., Munzert, S. & Yang, J. The consequences of online partisan media. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2013464118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kobayashi, T., Taka, F. & Suzuki, T. Can ‘Googling’ correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search. PLoS ONE 16, e0256575 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gillespie, T. Algorithmically recognizable: Santorum’s Google problem, and Google’s Santorum problem. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20, 63–80 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diakopoulos, N. Algorithmic accountability: journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digit. Journal. 3, 398–415 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Parry, D. A. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1535–1547 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker, M. Americans favor mobile devices over desktops and laptops for getting news. Pew Research Center https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/11/19/americans-favor-mobile-devices-over-desktops-and-laptops-for-getting-news/ (2019).

  • Trielli, D. & Diakopoulos, N. Search as news curator: the role of Google in shaping attention to news information. In Proc. 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300683 (ACM Press, 2019).

  • Nanz, A. & Matthes, J. Democratic consequences of incidental exposure to political information: a meta-analysis. J. Commun. 72, 345–373 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bechmann, A. & Nielbo, K. L. Are we exposed to the same ‘news’ in the news feed? An empirical analysis of filter bubbles as information similarity for Danish Facebook users. Digit. Journal. 6, 990–1002 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Guess, A. M. (Almost) everything in moderation: new evidence on Americans’ online media diets. Am. J. Political Sci. 65, 1007–1022 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reeves, B. et al. Screenomics: a framework to capture and analyze personal life experiences and the ways that technology shapes them. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36, 150–201 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stier, S., Mangold, F., Scharkow, M. & Breuer, J. Post post-broadcast democracy? News exposure in the age of online intermediaries. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 116, 768–774 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pan, B. et al. In Google we trust: users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12, 801–823 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kulshrestha, J. et al. Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search. Inf. Retr. J. 22, 188–227 (2019).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Joachims, T. et al. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 25, 7–es (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ebbinghaus, H. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology https://doi.org/10.1037/10011-000 (Teachers College Press, 1913).

  • Fishkin, R. New jumpshot 2018 data: where searches happen on the web (Google, Amazon, Facebook, & beyond). SparkToro https://sparktoro.com/blog/new-jumpshot-2018-data-where-searches-happen-on-the-web-google-amazon-facebook-beyond/ (2018).

  • Desktop search engine market share United States of America. StatCounter Global Stats https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/desktop/united-states-of-america/2020 (2020).

  • Brown, N. E. Political participation of women of color: an intersectional analysis. J. Women Polit. Policy 35, 315–348 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C. & van Anders, S. M. The future of sex and gender in psychology: five challenges to the gender binary. Am. Psychol. 74, 171–193 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link