Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505–511 (2014).
Guerra, C. A. et al. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. Science 371, 239–241 (2021).
Wall, D. H. et al. (eds) Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Jansson, J. K. & Hofmockel, K. S. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 35–46 (2020).
de Vries, F. T. et al. Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14296–14301 (2013).
Adhikari, K. & Hartemink, A. E. Linking soils to ecosystem services—a global review. Geoderma 262, 101–111 (2016).
Pereira, P., Bogunovic, I., Muñoz-Rojas, M. & Brevik, E. C. Soil ecosystem services, sustainability, valuation and management. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 5, 7–13 (2018).
Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N. & Six, J. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature 528, 69–76 (2015).
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 550–554 (2020).
Rillig, M. C. et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Science 366, 886–890 (2019).
Guerra, C. A. et al. Global vulnerability of soil ecosystems to erosion. Landsc. Ecol. 35, 823–842 (2020).
Geisen, S., Wall, D. H. & van der Putten, W. H. Challenges and opportunities for soil biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 29, R1036–R1044 (2019).
Jung, M. et al. Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1499–1509 (2021).
Xu, H. et al. Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 411–418 (2021).
Díaz, S. et al. (eds). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019); https://zenodo.org/record/3553579#.YyhIsXbMK70
Phillips, H. R. P. et al. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science 366, 480–485 (2019).
van den Hoogen, J. et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale. Nature 572, 194–198 (2019).
Delgado-baquerizo, M. et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 325, 320–325 (2018).
Tedersoo, L. et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346, 1256688 (2014).
Xu, X., Thornton, P. E. & Post, W. M. A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems: global soil microbial biomass C, N and P. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 737–749 (2013).
Djukic, I. et al. Early stage litter decomposition across biomes. Sci. Total Environ. 628–629, 1369–1394 (2018).
Guerra, C. A. et al. Global projections of the soil microbiome in the Anthropocene. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 987–999 (2021).
Cameron, E. K. et al. Global mismatches in aboveground and belowground biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1187–1192 (2019).
El Moujahid, L. et al. Effect of plant diversity on the diversity of soil organic compounds. PLoS One 12, e0170494 (2017).
Guerra, C. A. et al. Blind spots in global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research. Nat. Commun. 11, 3870 (2020).
Fierer, N. & Jackson, R. B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 626–631 (2006).
Tedersoo, L. et al. Regional-scale in-depth analysis of soil fungal diversity reveals strong pH and plant species effects in Northern Europe. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1953 (2020).
Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331–345 (2017).
Dornelas, M. et al. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344, 296–299 (2014).
Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Bode, M. & Richardson, D. M. Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142, 553–562 (2009).
Jürgens, N. et al. The BIOTA Biodiversity Observatories in Africa—a standardized framework for large-scale environmental monitoring. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, 655–678 (2012).
Wyborn, C. & Evans, M. C. Conservation needs to break free from global priority mapping. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1322–1324 (2021).
Hautier, Y. et al. Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 50–56 (2018).
Zhou, Z., Wang, C. & Luo, Y. Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nat. Commun. 11, 3072 (2020).
Eisenhauer, N., Schulz, W., Scheu, S. & Jousset, A. Niche dimensionality links biodiversity and invasibility of microbial communities. Funct. Ecol. 27, 282–288 (2013).
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270 (2014).
Haines-Young, R. H. & Potschin, M. B. in Ecosystems Ecology: A New Synthesis (eds Raffaelli, D. G. & Frid, C. L. J.) Ch. 6 (2012).
Smith, L. C. et al. Large‐scale drivers of relationships between soil microbial properties and organic carbon across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 2070–2083 (2021).
Keesstra, S. et al. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 610-611, 997–1009 (2018).
Le Provost, G. et al. Contrasting responses of above- and belowground diversity to multiple components of land-use intensity. Nat. Commun. 12, 3918 (2021).
Tanneberger, F. et al. The power of nature‐based solutions: how peatlands can help us to achieve key EU sustainability objectives. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 5, 2000146 (2021).
Johnston, A. et al. Observed and predicted effects of climate change on species abundance in protected areas. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 1055–1061 (2013).
Hannah, L. et al. Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 131–138 (2007).
Gallardo, B. et al. Protected areas offer refuge from invasive species spreading under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 5331–5343 (2017).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. The roads ahead: narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 169–180 (2017).
Fedele, G., Donatti, C. I., Bornacelly, I. & Hole, D. G. Nature-dependent people: mapping human direct use of nature for basic needs across the tropics. Glob. Environ. Change 71, 102368 (2021).
Visconti, P. et al. Protected area targets post-2020. Science 364, 239–241 (2019).
Allan, J. R. et al. The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity. Science 376, 1094–1101 (2022).
Maestre, F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Changes in belowground biodiversity during ecosystem development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 116, 6891–6896 (2019).
Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014).
Amaral-Zettler, L. A., McCliment, E. A., Ducklow, H. W. & Huse, S. M. A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PLoS One 4, e6372 (2009).
Stoeck, T. et al. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 19, 21–31 (2010).
Ramirez, K. S. et al. Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20141988 (2014).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).
Edgar, R. C. & Flyvbjerg, H. Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads. Bioinformatics 31, 3476–3482 (2015).
Edgar, R. C. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/081257 (2016).
Tedersoo, L. et al. Towards understanding diversity, endemicity and global change vulnerability of soil fungi. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.17.484796 (2022).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Global homogenization of the structure and function in the soil microbiome of urban greenspaces. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg5809 (2021).
Phillips, H. R. P., Heintz-Buschart, A. & Eisenhauer, N. Putting soil invertebrate diversity on the map. Mol. Ecol. 29, 655–657 (2020).
Xiong, W. et al. A global overview of the trophic structure within microbiomes across ecosystems. Environ. Int. 151, 106438 (2021).
Drummond, A. J. et al. Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment. Gigascience 4, 46 (2015).
Oliverio, A. M., Gan, H., Wickings, K. & Fierer, N. A DNA metabarcoding approach to characterize soil arthropod communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 125, 37–43 (2018).
Horton, D. J., Kershner, M. W. & Blackwood, C. B. Suitability of PCR primers for characterizing invertebrate communities from soil and leaf litter targeting metazoan 18S ribosomal or cytochrome oxidase I (COI) genes. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 80, 43–48 (2017).
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 210–220 (2020).
Carter, M. R. & Gregorich, E. G. (eds) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (CRC Press, 2007).
Sparks, D. L. et al. (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods (Wiley, 2020).
Nguyen, N. H. et al. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 20, 241–248 (2016).
Bell, C. W. et al. High-throughput fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. J. Vis. Exp. 81, e50961 (2013).
Wang, L. et al. Diversifying livestock promotes multidiversity and multifunctionality in managed grasslands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 116, 6187–6192 (2019).
Durán, J., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Rodríguez, A., Covelo, F. & Gallardo, A. Ionic exchange membranes (IEMs): a good indicator of soil inorganic N production. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 964–968 (2013).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).
Sharma, N. XGBoost. The Extreme Gradient Boosting for Mining Applications (GRIN Verlag, 2018).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016).
Wilson. ParBayesianOptimization: Parallel Bayesian Optimization of Hyperparameters. R version 1 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ParBayesianOptimization (2021).
Hastie, T., Friedman, J. & Tibshirani, R. The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer, 2001).
Jackson, D. A. & Chen, Y. Robust principal component analysis and outlier detection with ecological data. Environmetrics 15, 129–139 (2004).
Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24, 123–140 (1996).
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J. & Olshen, R. A. Classification and Regression Trees (Routledge, 1984).
Ord, J. K. & Getis, A. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr. Anal. 27, 286–306 (2010).
Getis, A. & Ord, J. K. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24, 189–206 (2010).
Prasannakumar, V., Vijith, H., Charutha, R. & Geetha, N. Spatio-temporal clustering of road accidents: GIS based analysis and assessment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 21, 317–325 (2011).
Lin, G. Comparing spatial clustering tests based on rare to common spatial events. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 28, 691–699 (2004).
Araújo, M. B. et al. Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4858 (2019).
Rousseeuw, P. J. & van Zomeren, B. C. Unmasking multivariate outliers and leverage points. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85, 633–639 (1990).
Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J. & Piontek, F. A trend-preserving bias correction—the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst. Dyn. 4, 219–236 (2013).
Lawrence, D. M. et al. The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 2973–2998 (2016).
Kim, H. et al. A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 4537–4562 (2018).
Dufresne, J.-L. et al. Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim. Dyn. 40, 2123–2165 (2013).
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim. Change 109, 117 (2011).
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 5425–5464 (2020).
Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387–400 (2014).
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
Powers, R. P. & Jetz, W. Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 323–329 (2019).
More News
Could bird flu in cows lead to a human outbreak? Slow response worries scientists
US halts funding to controversial virus-hunting group: what researchers think
How high-fat diets feed breast cancer