Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).
Bell, J. S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964).
Bell, J. S. in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy 2nd edn, Ch. 24, 232–248 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V. & Wehner, S. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).
Giustina, M. et al. Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
Shalm, L. K. et al. Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
Li, M.-H. et al. Test of local realism into the past without detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 080404 (2018).
Rosenfeld, W. et al. Event-ready Bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017).
Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
Kurpiers, P. et al. Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons. Nature 558, 264–267 (2018).
Walter, T. et al. Rapid, high-fidelity, single-shot dispersive readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 054020 (2017).
Magnard, P. et al. Microwave quantum link between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260502 (2020).
Scarani, V. Bell Nonlocality (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).
Freedman, S. J. & Clauser, J. F. Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).
Larsson, J.-A. Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 424003 (2014).
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. & Roger, G. Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time- varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).
Rowe, M. A. et al. Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001).
Aspect, A. Closing the door on Einstein and Bohr’s quantum debate. Physics 8, 123 (2015).
Acín, A. et al. Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
Šupić, I. & Bowles, J. Self-testing of quantum systems: a review. Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Wagner, S. & Sangouard, N. Certifying the building blocks of quantum computers from Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180505 (2018).
Vazirani, U. & Vidick, T. Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140501 (2014).
Colbeck, R. Quantum and Relativistic Protocols for Secure Multi-Party Computation. PhD thesis, Univ. Cambridge (2009).
Pironio, S. et al. Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature 464, 1021–1024 (2010).
Colbeck, R. & Renner, R. Free randomness can be amplified. Nat. Phys. 8, 450–453 (2012).
Kessler, M. & Arnon-Friedman, R. Device-independent randomness amplification and privatization. IEEE J. Selected Areas Inf. Theory 1, 568–584 (2020).
Krinner, S. et al. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605, 669–674 (2022).
Leggett, A. J. Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement. Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 69, 80–100 (1980).
Clarke, J. & Wilhelm, F. K. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031–1042 (2008).
Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H. & Clarke, J. Energy-level quantization in the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1543 (1985).
Ansmann, M. et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461, 504–506 (2009).
The BIG Bell Test Collaboration. Challenging local realism with human choices. Nature 557, 212–216 (2018).
Zhong, Y. P. et al. Violating Bell’s inequality with remotely connected superconducting qubits. Nat. Phys. 15, 741–744 (2019).
Wootters, W. K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P. & Horodecki, M. Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-12 states: necessary and sufficient condition. Phys. Lett. A 200, 340 (1995).
Garg, A. & Mermin, N. D. Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. D 35, 3831 (1987).
Eberhard, P. H. Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. A 47, R747 (1993).
Magnard, P. Meter-Scale Microwave Quantum Networks for Superconducting Circuits. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2021).
Axline, C. et al. On-demand quantum state transfer and entanglement between remote microwave cavity memories. Nat. Phys. 14, 705–710 (2018).
Campagne-Ibarcq, P. et al. Deterministic remote entanglement of superconducting circuits through microwave two-photon transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200501 (2018).
Kurpiers, P., Walter, T., Magnard, P., Salathe, Y. & Wallraff, A. Characterizing the attenuation of coaxial and rectangular microwave-frequency waveguides at cryogenic temperatures. EPJ Quant. Technol. 4, 8 (2017).
D’Addabbo, A. et al. The CUORE cryostat. J. Low Temp. Phys. 193, 867–875 (2018).
Pechal, M. et al. Microwave-controlled generation of shaped single photons in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041010 (2014).
Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Mitrani, D., Pruneri, V. & Mitchell, M. W. Generation of fresh and pure random numbers for loophole-free Bell tests. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250403 (2015).
Burkhart, L. D. et al. Error-detected state transfer and entanglement in a superconducting quantum network. PRX Quantum 2, 030321 (2021).
Barrett, J., Hardy, L. & Kent, A. No signalling and quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005).
Peñas, G. F., Puebla, R., Ramos, T., Rabl, P. & García-Ripoll, J. J. Universal deterministic quantum operations in microwave quantum links. Phys. Rev. Applied 17, 054038 (2022).
Kjaergaard, M. et al. Superconducting qubits: current state of play. Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369–395 (2020).
Josephson, B. D. Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett. 1, 251–253 (1962).
Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
DiCarlo, L. et al. Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor. Nature 460, 240–244 (2009).
Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M. & Wallraff, A. Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021).
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J. & Mabuchi, H. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
Scheidl, T. et al. Violation of local realism with freedom of choice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19708 (2010).
Zhang, Y., Glancy, S. & Knill, E. Asymptotically optimal data analysis for rejecting local realism. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062118 (2011).
More News
Author Correction: Stepwise activation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor – Nature
Changing rainforest to plantations shifts tropical food webs
Streamlined skull helps foxes take a nosedive