Wutz, G. et al. Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF, WAPL, and PDS5 proteins. EMBO J. 36, 3573–3599 (2017).
Beagan, J. A. & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. On the existence and functionality of topologically associating domains. Nat. Genet. 52, 8–16 (2020).
Davidson, I. F. & Peters, J.-M. Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 445–464 (2021).
Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains. Cell 171, 305–320.e24 (2017).
Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
Merkenschlager, M. & Nora, E. P. CTCF and Cohesin in Genome Folding and Transcriptional Gene Regulation. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 17, 17–43 (2016).
Luppino, J. M. et al. Cohesin promotes stochastic domain intermingling to ensure proper regulation of boundary-proximal genes. Nat. Genet. 52, 840–848 (2020).
Kriz, A. J., Colognori, D., Sunwoo, H., Nabet, B. & Lee, J. T. Balancing cohesin eviction and retention prevents aberrant chromosomal interactions, Polycomb-mediated repression, and X-inactivation. Mol. Cell 81, 1970–1987.e9 (2021).
Linares-Saldana, R. et al. BRD4 orchestrates genome folding to promote neural crest differentiation. Nat. Genet. 53, 1480–1492 (2021).
Liu, N. Q. et al. Rapid depletion of CTCF and cohesin proteins reveals dynamic features of chromosome architecture. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.27.457977v1 (2021).
Beliveau, B. J. et al. Versatile design and synthesis platform for visualizing genomes with Oligopaint FISH probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 21301–21306 (2012).
Ciosk, R. et al. Cohesin’s Binding to Chromosomes Depends on a Separate Complex Consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 Proteins. Mol. Cell 5, 243–254 (2000).
Kueng, S. et al. Wapl Controls the Dynamic Association of Cohesin with Chromatin. Cell 127, 955–967 (2006).
Haarhuis, J. H. I. et al. The Cohesin Release Factor WAPL Restricts Chromatin Loop Extension. Cell 169, 693–707.e14 (2017).
Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B. & Hopkins, A. L. How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 993–996 (2006).
Sakharkar, M. K. & Sakharkar, K. R. Targetability of Human Disease Genes. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 4, 48–58 (2007).
Boyle, S. et al. A central role for canonical PRC1 in shaping the 3D nuclear landscape. Genes Dev. 34, 931–949 (2020).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D607–D613 (2019).
Doble, B. W., Patel, S., Wood, G. A., Kockeritz, L. K. & Woodgett, J. R. Functional Redundancy of GSK-3α and GSK-3β in Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Shown by Using an Allelic Series of Embryonic Stem Cell Lines. Dev. Cell 12, 957–971 (2007).
Sutherland, C. What are the bona fide GSK3 substrates? Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011, e505607 (2011).
Beurel, E., Grieco, S. F. & Jope, R. S. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): regulation, actions, and diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 0, 114–131 (2015).
Chen, X. et al. A chemical-genetic approach reveals the distinct roles of GSK3α and GSK3β in regulating embryonic stem cell fate. Dev. Cell 43, 563–576.e4 (2017).
Shinde, M. Y. et al. Phosphoproteomics reveals that glycogen synthase kinase-3 phosphorylates multiple splicing factors and is associated with alternative splicing. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 18240–18255 (2017).
Peifer, M., Pai, L.-M. & Casey, M. Phosphorylation of the Drosophila adherens junction protein Armadillo: roles for Wingless Signal and Zeste-white 3 kinase. Dev. Biol. 166, 543–556 (1994).
Yost, C. et al. The axis-inducing activity, stability, and subcellular distribution of beta-catenin is regulated in Xenopus embryos by glycogen synthase kinase 3. Genes Dev. 10, 1443–1454 (1996).
Wagner, F. F. et al. Exploiting an Asp-Glu “switch” in glycogen synthase kinase 3 to design paralog-selective inhibitors for use in acute myeloid leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaam8460 (2018).
Engler, T. A. et al. Substituted 3-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl- 4-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-[1,4]diazepino-[6,7,1-hi]indol-7-yl)pyrrole-2,5-diones as highly selective and potent inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase-3. J. Med. Chem. 47, 3934–3937 (2004).
An, W. F. et al. Discovery of potent and highly selective inhibitors of GSK3b. In Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program (National Center for Biotechnology Information (US), 2010).
Vian, L. et al. The energetics and physiological impact of cohesin extrusion. Cell 173, 1165–1178.e20 (2018).
Barrington, C. et al. Enhancer accessibility and CTCF occupancy underlie asymmetric TAD architecture and cell type specific genome topology. Nat. Commun. 10, 2908 (2019).
Natsume, T., Kiyomitsu, T., Saga, Y. & Kanemaki, M. T. Rapid protein depletion in human cells by auxin-inducible degron tagging with short homology donors. Cell Rep. 15, 210–218 (2016).
Tedeschi, A. et al. Wapl is an essential regulator of chromatin structure and chromosome segregation. Nature 501, 564–568 (2013).
Branon, T. C. et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 880–887 (2018).
Kikuchi, S., Borek, D. M., Otwinowski, Z., Tomchick, D. R. & Yu, H. Crystal structure of the cohesin loader Scc2 and insight into cohesinopathy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 12444–12449 (2016).
Petela, N. J. et al. Scc2 is a potent activator of cohesin’s ATPase that promotes loading by binding Scc1 without Pds5. Mol. Cell 70, 1134–1148.e7 (2018).
Kean, C. M. et al. Decreasing Wapl dosage partially corrects embryonic growth and brain transcriptome phenotypes in Nipbl+/− embryos. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd4136 (2022).
Luppino, J. M. et al. Co-depletion of NIPBL and WAPL balance cohesin activity to correct gene misexpression. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010528 (2022).
Joyce, E. F., Williams, B. R., Xie, T. & Wu, C. -ting. Identification of genes that promote or antagonize somatic homolog pairing using a high-throughput FISH-based screen. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002667 (2012).
Shachar, S., Voss, T. C., Pegoraro, G., Sciascia, N. & Misteli, T. Identification of gene positioning factors using high-throughput imaging mapping. Cell 162, 911–923 (2015).
Finn, E. H. et al. Extensive heterogeneity and intrinsic variation in spatial genome organization. Cell 176, 1502–1515 (2019).
Chin, C. V. et al. Cohesin mutations are synthetic lethal with stimulation of WNT signaling. eLife 9, e61405 (2020).
Grazioli, P. et al. Lithium as a possible therapeutic strategy for Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Cell Death Discov. 7, 1–11 (2021).
Bottai, D. et al. Modeling Cornelia de Lange syndrome in vitro and in vivo reveals a role for cohesin complex in neuronal survival and differentiation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 28, 64–73 (2019).
Kaidanovich-Beilin, O. & Woodgett, J. GSK-3: functional insights from cell biology and animal models. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 4, 40 (2011).
Hegemann, B. et al. Systematic phosphorylation analysis of human mitotic protein complexes. Sci. Signal. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001993 (2011).
Liang, C. et al. A kinase-dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting mitotic centromere cohesion. EMBO Rep. 19, 43–56 (2018).
Beliveau, B. J. et al. OligoMiner provides a rapid, flexible environment for the design of genome-scale oligonucleotide in situ hybridization probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, E2183–E2192 (2018).
Bintu, B. et al. Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells. Science 362, eaau1783 (2018).
Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).
Mateo, L. J. et al. Visualizing DNA folding and RNA in embryos at single-cell resolution. Nature 568, 49 (2019).
Saito, Y. & Kanemaki, M. T. Targeted Protein Depletion Using the Auxin-Inducible Degron 2 (AID2) System. Curr. Protoc. 1, e219 (2021).
Beckwith, K. S. et al. Visualization of loop extrusion by nanoscale 3D DNA tracing in single human cells. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.12.439407 (2022).
Shah, P. P. et al. Pathogenic LMNA variants disrupt cardiac lamina-chromatin interactions and de-repress alternative fate genes. Cell Stem Cell 28, 938–954.e9 (2021).
Rhodes, J., Mazza, D., Nasmyth, K. & Uphoff, S. Scc2/Nipbl hops between chromosomal cohesin rings after loading. eLife 6, e30000 (2017).
Cho, K. F. et al. Proximity labeling in mammalian cells with TurboID and split-TurboID. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3971–3999 (2020).
Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).
Yesbolatova, A. et al. The auxin-inducible degron 2 technology provides sharp degradation control in yeast, mammalian cells, and mice. Nat. Commun. 11, 5701 (2020).
McQuin, C. et al. CellProfiler 3.0: Next-generation image processing for biology. PLoS Biol. 16, e2005970 (2018).
Li, C. H. & Lee, C. K. Minimum cross entropy thresholding. Pattern Recognit. 26, 617–625 (1993).
Otsu, N. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9, 62–66 (1979).
Drasgow, F. in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (eds. Kotz, S. et al.) https://doi.org/10.1002/0471667196.ess2014.pub2 (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).
Ollion, J., Cochennec, J., Loll, F., Escudé, C. & Boudier, T. TANGO: a generic tool for high-throughput 3D image analysis for studying nuclear organization. Bioinformatics 29, 1840–1841 (2013).
Ollion, J., Cochennec, J., Loll, F., Escudé, C. & Boudier, T. in The Nucleus (ed. Hancock, R.) 203–222 (Springer, 2015).
Stirling, D. R. et al. CellProfiler 4: improvements in speed, utility and usability. BMC Bioinf. 22, 433 (2021).
Babraham Bioinformatics. FastQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data, https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
Schneider, V. A. et al. Evaluation of GRCh38 and de novo haploid genome assemblies demonstrates the enduring quality of the reference assembly. Genome Res. 27, 849–864 (2017).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Wu, D.-Y., Bittencourt, D., Stallcup, M. R. & Siegmund, K. D. Identifying differential transcription factor binding in ChIP-seq. Front. Genet. 6, 169 (2015).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Lopez-Delisle, L. et al. pyGenomeTracks: reproducible plots for multivariate genomic datasets. Bioinformatics 37, 422–423 (2021).
Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 16, 259 (2015).
Yang, T. et al. HiCRep: assessing the reproducibility of Hi-C data using a stratum-adjusted correlation coefficient. Genome Res. 27, 1939–1949 (2017).
Fernandez, L. R., Gilgenast, T. G. & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. 3DeFDR: statistical methods for identifying cell type-specific looping interactions in 5C and Hi-C data. Genome Biol. 21, 219 (2020).
Emerson, D. J. et al. Cohesin-mediated loop anchors confine the locations of human replication origins. Nature 606, 812–819 (2022).
Knight, P. A. & Ruiz, D. A fast algorithm for matrix balancing. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 33, 1029–1047 (2013).
Norton, H. K. et al. Detecting hierarchical genome folding with network modularity. Nat. Methods 15, 119–122 (2018).
Zhang, H. et al. Chromatin structure dynamics during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition. Nature 576, 158–162 (2019).
Wolff, J. et al. Galaxy HiCExplorer 3: a web server for reproducible Hi-C, capture Hi-C and single-cell Hi-C data analysis, quality control and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W177–W184 (2020).
Open2C et al. Cooltools: enabling high-resolution Hi-C analysis in Python. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.31.514564 (2022).
Roayaei Ardakany, A., Gezer, H. T., Lonardi, S. & Ay, F. Mustache: multi-scale detection of chromatin loops from Hi-C and Micro-C maps using scale-space representation. Genome Biol. 21, 256 (2020).
Flyamer, I. M., Illingworth, R. S. & Bickmore, W. A. Coolpup.py: versatile pile-up analysis of Hi-C data. Bioinformatics 36, 2980–2985 (2020).
Yoon, S., Chandra, A. & Vahedi, G. Stripenn detects architectural stripes from chromatin conformation data using computer vision. Nat. Commun. 13, 1602 (2022).
Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).
More News
Could bird flu in cows lead to a human outbreak? Slow response worries scientists
US halts funding to controversial virus-hunting group: what researchers think
How high-fat diets feed breast cancer